When Are Chiasms Admissible as Evidence?

When Are Chiasms Admissible as Evidence?
Section and Issue
Product Attributes
PDF (Download)

When Are Chiasms Admissible as Evidence?

Author W. Farrell Edwards Author Boyd F. Edwards

*This article is being offered free as a courtesy to lds.org as it was footnoted in an expanded Gospel Topic on their site.

Since John Welch's discovery of chiasmus in the Book of Mormon in 1967, many critics have attempted to show how chiasmus appears in just about every type of literature, from Dr. Seuss to Strangite scripture. This article discusses the authors' statistical admissibility tests to verify whether a chiasmus in a work shows strong evidence of intentionality by the original author. Their results indicate that certain passages in the Old Testament and in the Book of Mormon show deliberate chiasmus, while Strangite scripture, the Doctrine and Covenants, nursery rhymes, Dr. Seuss, and other works are not intentionally chiastic.

As explained in the article, here are the available appendices to this article:
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C