Notes
1. In discussing the Mormon conflict in Carroll County it is important to note that in 1876, James Trotter prepared what is known to be the first published history of the region. (See Trotter, “History of Carroll County, Missouri,” in An Illustrated Historical Atlas of Carroll County, Missouri [N.p.: Brink, McDonough, & Co., 1876]). In his narrative, Trotter included a detailed historical reminiscence of the Mormon problems written by A. C. Blackwell, a member of the Carrollton County militia and the committee who oversaw the negotiations associated with the Mormon expulsion from De Witt. It appears Trotter specifically requested Blackwell write the history so he could include it in his text. Thereafter, Blackwell’s detailed reminiscence of the Mormon conflict in Carroll County forms the basis, or was the actual text, used by local and state historians in their histories about the Latter-day Saints in the county. (See History of Carroll County, Missouri, Carefully Written and Compiled from the Most Authentic Official and Private Sources, Including a History of its Townships, Cities, Towns and Villages, Together With a Condensed History of Missouri; the Condition of the United States, and State of Missouri; a Military Record of its Volunteers in Either Army of the Great Civil War; General and Local Statistics; Miscellany; Reminiscences, Grave, Tragic and Humorous; Biographical Sketches of Prominent Men and Citizens Identified With the Interests of the County [St. Louis: Missouri Historical Company, 1881], 247–62; W. F. Switzler, Switzler’s Illustrated History of Missouri From 1541 to 1877, 244–47; S. K. Turner and S. A. Clark, Twentieth Century History of Carroll County Missouri [Indianapolis: B. F. Bowen & Company, 1911] 204–13; Susan H. Whiteman, “Mormon Troubles in Carroll County,” Missouri Historical Review 8 [July 1914]:220–22; and “The Mormon War,” De Witt History, 1836–1986 [De Witt, Missouri: De Witt Town and Country Betterment Club, 1986], 12–13.)
Since Blackwell wrote his historical reminiscence nearly forty years after the De Witt episode and was relying mostly on memory, he occasionally erred in his reporting, particularly regarding specific dates of the events associated with the expulsion. In Leland H. Gentry and Keith W. Perkins’ separate discussions on De Witt, the two writers apparently assumed Blackwell’s dates were accurate and accepted them as such, even though many are clearly incorrect. Because of their failure to recognize and identify Blackwell’s dating errors, both authors discussed and placed several of the events associated with the Mormon expulsion in an incorrect time frame and sequence and are therefore inaccurate. (See Gentry, “History of the Latter-day Saints in Northern Missouri From 1836–1839,” 194–212; and Keith W. Perkins, “De Witt—Prelude to Expulsion,” Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint Church History: Missouri, 261–280.)
2. David Thomas to Joseph Smith, Jr., 31 March 1838, in Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 2:225–26. In the letter, Thomas also proposed selling to the Mormons a section of land in Monroe County, near the confluence of the North Fork of the Salt and the Salt Rivers in the eastern portion of the state. See also Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 36.
3. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:450. See also Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 36..
4. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:450–51.
5. Murdock, “Journal,” 18.
6. The figure for the number of De Witt town lots purchased from Root was obtained from the map printed in Perkins, “De Witt—Prelude to Expulsion,” 266. See also Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:450–51; and Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 365–37. Following the Mormon expulsion from the state, Root relocated with the majority of Latter-day Saints in Quincy, Illinois where he wrote a petition in behalf of the Saints. (See Root petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 332; also in HC 4:62–63.) Local histories state he remained in Quincy where he became a banker. (Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Shortly after the Missouri period he apparently discontinued his association with the Latter-day Saints.
7. Michael S. Riggs has put forth another possible explanation for the Mormon War focusing on the De Witt community. Riggs contends Ft. Leavenworth actually provided the greatest market for Mormon products and argued that transporting goods via the water was more economical than overland. By shipping their goods through De Witt, the Mormons would bypass the landing at Liberty thereby eliminating the fees levied there. (See Riggs, “The Economic Impact of Fort Leavenworth on Northwestern Missouri 1827–1838: Yet Another Reason for the Mormon War,” Restoration Studies 5 [1988]: 124–133.)
8. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Mormon historian Andrew Jenson suggested the purchase was made in order to provide a place of settlement for a number of Canadian converts who were planning to emigrate to Missouri. He wrote, “As quite a number of Saints were expected from Canada that season, it was decided by the authorities of the Church that they, upon their arrival in Missouri, should locate at De Witt, if the place suited them.” (Jenson, “De Witt,” The Historical Record 7 [July 1888]: 603.)
9. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.
10. The minutes of a high council meeting on July 6 show that Hinkle had already moved to De Witt and wanted to sell his home in Far West to Edward Partridge. (See Cannon and Cook, Far West Record, 197.) Charles H. Hales is the source indicating Hinkle was made the branch president. (See Charles H. Hales, “Autobiography” in Windows: A Mormon Family, 34.) Citing the Albert Perry Rockwood Journal, Keith W. Perkins incorrectly stated a stake was made at De Witt. Rockwood however, specifically indicated no such stake was ever made. (See Perkins, “De Witt: Prelude to Expulsion, 265; and Rockwood, “Journal,” 21.)
11. Walter Williams, ed. A History of Northwest Missouri (Chicago and New York: Lewis Publishing Company, 1915), 399.
12. Blackwell gave the date of the first meeting as taking place on July 14. (See Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) However, the actual date of the meeting as given in press reports indicates it was held on July 30. (Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838.) His narrative indicates three public meetings were held in July and August to discuss plans concerning the Mormons (July 14, 21, and August 11), whereas the reports published in the Missouri Republican under the dates of August 18 and 25, specifically state there were only two meetings (July 30 and August 7). Both Gentry and Perkins failed to cite the published report as given in the Missouri Republican, relying exclusively on Blackwell’s reminiscence and therefore incorrectly date when the meetings were held and the sequence of events. (See Gentry, “A History of the Latter-day Saints in Northern Missouri From 1836–1839,” 194–96; and Perkins, “De Witt: Prelude to Expulsion,” 265.) LeSueur makes no mention of either the Mormon or anti-Mormon activities in De Witt in July or August.
13. Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838.
14. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
15. Murdock, “Journal,” 18. As noted, the press report stated Abott Hancock, Samuel Williams, and John Smart were the Carrollton representatives. Murdock indicated Hancock, Smart, and Sashiel Woods were the men who were sent. Hancock and Woods were ministers.
16. Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838. The record indicates the committee only met with Root. David Thomas was absent from the meeting.
17. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
18. Ibid; and Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838. Upon being informed by the Carrollton committee concerning the Mormon problem, the citizens of Saline and Howard counties met on August 21 and 30 respectively, and adopted a “wait-and-see” attitude—indicating they would be ready and willing to give aid if the situation escalated. (See Missouri Republican, 6 September 1838).
Stephen LeSueur has argued that the actions of the Carroll majority should not be considered as being entirely lawless in terms of nineteenth century standards governing American republicanism. Concerning the procedure by which the local citizens attempted to expel the Mormons, he has concluded: “The settlers in Carroll and the surrounding counties . . . did not simply gather in mobs to expel the Saints. Instead, they called public meetings (at which the leading citizens participated), debated what action to take, elected officers, established committees of vigilance, . . . published the proceedings of their meetings . . . . held a public vote to decide whether to allow the Mormons to remain . . . . and sent representatives to the Mormons to request that they leave their counties. Their procedures followed common patterns of vigilantism in the Unites States during this period. They acted in an orderly, rational manner to preserve their culture and values. The Mormons of course, condemned these proceedings as unlawful and ‘mobocratic.’ Yet the participants considered their actions to be a proper response to the Mormon problem. Their willingness to give the Mormons official notice of their resolutions created an impression of forbearance, making it appear as if the Mormons, by refusing to leave, were bringing the violence upon themselves. Moreover, their restrained and orderly procedures seemed to legitimize their actions, allowing them to operates as if their extra-legal organizations carried the same force as their official county governments.” (Stephen C. LeSueur, “A Scarter [sic] Man Than One of Them Was I Never Saw: Attitudes and Perceptions of Missourians During the 1838 Mormon War,” Mormon Miscellaneous Papers, No. 1, May 1986, 6–7.)
19. I. H. Arnold to Isaac Arnold, 12 August 1838, typescript, RLDS Archives, Independence, Missouri, 2–3.
20. Arthur Bradford to Thomas Bradford, 13 August 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 114.
21. Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470. William Claude Jones was the commander of the Carroll County militia. (See Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.)
22. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503; also Murdock, “Journal,” 18; and John Taylor, A Short Account of the Murders, Roberies [sic], Burnings, Thefts, and Other Outrages Committed by the Mob and Militia of the State of Missouri Upon the Latter Day Saints. The Persecutions They Have Endured for Their Religion, and Their Banishment From that State by the Authorities There, by John Taylor, Elder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Commerce, Illinois: 1839), 2–3.
23. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.
24. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
25. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503. In his journal, Murdock specifically recorded that on August 20, “a mob of more than a hundred men came, and ordered us off.” (Murdock, “Journal,” 18.) John Thorp later recalled this incident: “A mob arose . . . headed by Sashael Wood a presbyterian Preacher and marched into the Town of Dewett [sic] and fired their guns and frighten[e]d the women this Town belong[e]d to us and they notified us to leave there in ten days. after ten days they came and fired on us.” (Thorp petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 548.)
26. John Taylor, A Short Account, 3. Smith Humphrey testified he “Saw the Sheriff of said Co. take G. M. Hinkel [sic] a prisoner & carry him out of town [but] the said Hinkel returned the same evening.” (Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470.)
27. Murdock, “Journal,” 18.
28. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
29. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.
30. B. H. Roberts, The Life of John Taylor, Third President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1963), 56–57. Taylor did not participate in any action while in De Witt. His stay there was only a few days when he continued on to Far West. He also indicated the Missourians captured a “stray Saint” (Ibid, 57), with possible reference to either Smith Humphrey or Pierce Hawley’s detention.
In his narrative, A Short Account, Taylor indicated that the intrusion of De Witt by Jones and Woods, including Hinkle’s arrest, took place in late September. (Taylor, A Short Account, 2–3.) However, John Murdock specifically stated it occurred on August 20. (Murdock, “Journal,” 18.) In his petition, Murdock also notes it as taking place about that same time. (Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.) Smith Humphrey’s petition also supports the August date. (Ibid, 470.)
31. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Blackwell stated the campsite was known as Pleasant Park. (Ibid.) John Murdock is the source indicating the encampment was about a mile west of De Witt. He also stated it was an old camp meeting ground. (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)
32. Root petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 332. Root specifically stated the group under Austin were acting “under no regular authority.”
33. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. In his history, A. C. Blackwell stated the Carroll and Saline troops returned from Daviess on September 9, the Mormons were then given ten days to evacuate (this would have been from September 10–19), with the final assault beginning on September 20 and lasting until around October 1. This is incorrect. All other sources support the following time line: The Carrollton (and Saline) companies returned from Daviess on September 19 or 20; the Mormons then were given the ten-day grace period, September 20–30; and the final siege on the Mormon community and actual fighting began on October 1. As noted, the multi-county vigilante forces did not leave Daviess until after Atchison ordered them to do so following the court of inquiry held on September 18–19. (Ibid; and David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 20 September 1838, in Document, 27; also in HC 3:81–82; and Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 38.)
34. Citizens of Carroll to Mrs. Smith, 10 September 1838, in Journal History, 10 September 1838. Mrs. Smith is likely Elizabeth Smith, whose name appears on the 22 September 1838 petition to Governor Boggs, and is the only female name on the petition, indicating she was the head of the household because of the death of her husband. (See Document, 29–30.) A few of the circumstances surrounding the death of her husband are referred to in a postscript included in the letter and also contains an additional warning. “The circumstances under which you became defenseless and your children orphans endear the memory of your husband to our hearts, and his heroic efforts to rescue his suffering and dying fellow-mortals from the jaws of death, have immortalized his name and place his wife and children under our protection. Do not, therefore, disregard our counsel, we conjure you, but leave that ill-fated place as we are determined to remove all Mormons and their aids and abettors from the county.” (Ibid.)
35. Emos McNell petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 494. After leaving Missouri, McNell subsequently relocated in Hancock County, Illinois, where he became a member of the Church and was an active participant during the Nauvoo period. He is listed as Enos McNoll in Susan Easton Black, comp., Membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1848 (Provo: Religious Studies Center and the Department of Church History and Doctrine, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 1989), 30:437.
36. Thomas Hollinshead petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 237. It is assumed Hollinshead was a non-member at the time he was living in De Witt based upon the fact that the treatment both he and McNell received was similar and there is no record of his membership. However, his petition indicated he did in fact at some time join the Church. Following the De Witt expulsion he stated he was also forced to leave the state “with the others professing the Same religion as my Self. (Ibid.) Hollinshead is cited as being a member in Black, Membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 23:574.
37. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
38. John Murdock wrote, “George M. Hinkle took the command of our men. I of ten men. H. S. Sherwood of ten, Brother Surley [probably Albert Soree] ten.” (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)
39. Petition of the De Witt Mormons to Lilburn W. Boggs, Document, 29–30; also HC 3:82–83. David Thomas is the only individual on the list who is specifically listed as a non-Mormon. However, as noted Elizabeth Smith was likely not a member, as was A. L. Caldwell.
40. HC 3:85. On September 21, the Canadian company was reported to have been in Randolph County, approximately 30–40 miles to the east. On that date an unnamed individual reported, “Thirty wagons left my house this morning for Far West, all Canadians and Mormons to join Jo Smith & Co.” (Missouri Republican, 29 September 1838.) Considering the remaining distance the company had to travel, their arrival at De Witt probably occurred around September 23–25. In a reminiscent history, Page incorrectly indicated his party arrived at the De Witt landing during the first week of October. (See Page, “History of John E. Page,” Millennial Star 27 [18 February 1865]: 103.) Page’s company was not the first or only group of Canadians to arrive at De Witt, but it was probably the largest. As noted previously, John Taylor, also a citizen of Canada, arrived in late August. Stephen Markham, though not from Canada, also arrived at De Witt about the end of September. Warren Foote stated Markham had intentions of going on to Far West but was detained by the mob at De Witt. (See Foote, Autobiography,” 25.)
41. Hales, “Autobiography,” 34.
42. Zadok Knapp Judd, “Autobiography of Zadoc Knapp Judd,” typescript, Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University Library, Provo, Utah, 7–8. The name of Arza Judd, Zadoc’s father, was not on the September 22 petition sent to Boggs, indicating his family was likely part of the Canadian company that arrived the last week of September.
43. Christopher Merkley, Biography of Christopher Merkley, Written by Himself (Salt Lake City: J. H. Parry & Company, 1887), 4. Zadok Judd expressed how difficult it was for some to take up arms in defense of the community. “This state of affairs was very trying to some of our sober, serious Christians that had been taught that it was wicked to fight; it almost rocked their faith in the gospel; to take up arms and try to kill their fellow mortals was a new doctrine that some could hardly endure and it was reported some feigned sickness and stayed in their wagons.” (Judd, “Autobiography,” 8–9.)
44. This figure can be substantiated from a number of sources including: HC 3:159; Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 1:215; and Daniel Avery, William Hawk, Joseph Smith, and Sidney Rigdon petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 128, 226, 347, and 666; also in HC 3:451; 4:58, 60–61. In addition, the September 22 petition contained the names of 50 individuals (all of whom were males, with the exception of one) who were likely heads of households. That figure, combined with the 30 Canadian families who arrived at the end of September brings the figure to 80. Thus, the calculation 70–80.
LeSueur wrote the arrival of the Canadian Saints in late September “finally provoked the attack on the Mormon town.” (LeSueur, The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 102.) This however is incorrect, since the Missourians made it clear to the Mormons on September 20 that they would attack the community following the ten-day grace period.
45. Smith, “My Journal,” p. 64.
46. Don Carlos Smith, “A Journal Kept by Don C. Smith, While on a Mission with George A. Smith, His Cousin,” in Lucy Mack Smith, Biographical Sketches of Joseph Smith, the Prophet, and His Progenitors for Many Generations (Liverpool: Published for Orson Pratt by S. W. Richards, 1853), 284.
47. Smith, “My Journal,” 65. The trial was apparently held at Boonville since the letters sent by Atchison up until the date of October 16, were addressed from Boonville. Lucas’ October 4 letter to Governor Boggs was also sent from Boonville. (See Document, 34–35.)
48. Smith, “My Journal,” 65. Both George A. Smith and Don Carlos reported that after embarking from De Witt, Moses Wilson boasted of the deeds he committed against the Mormons in Jackson County. (See Ibid, and D. C. Smith, “Journal,” 284–85.)
49. Samuel Lucas to Lilburn W. Boggs, 4 October 1838, in Document, 34–35; also in HC 3:150.
50. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. During the month of October, Nathan Knight was passing through Carroll when was accosted twice by men who were patrolling the county roads. After being held for four days, he escaped and was able to make it back to Far West by riding over the open prairie. (Knight petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 476.)
51. Murdock, “Journal,” 20.
52. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
53. Edward Lampkin to Thomas Bradford, 23 September 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor, Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 115.
54. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.
55. Rockwood, “Journal,” 21.
56. Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470. In a second petition, Humphrey wrote another account of the house burning. (See Ibid, 241.) Other Latter-day Saints made mention of Humphrey’s ordeal in their recollections of the Missouri persecutions. (See William Hawk petition in Ibid, 228; also in HC 4:58; Parley P. Pratt petition, Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 640; also HC 3:425; Pratt, History of the Late Persecution, 29; also in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 75; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 39; and Edward Stevenson, “The Life and History of Elder Edward Stevenson,” manuscript (copy), Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 90.)
A brief narrative of Humphrey’s home burning appears in the HC under the date of October 9 (see HC 3:157), but as noted Humphrey stated it took place around October 1. Humphrey also stated that a man by the name of Hiram Standley directed the attack on his home. In the published report of Carrollton’s July and August public meetings, a James Standley is mentioned. (Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838). Blackwell gives the names of a James and John Standley as being leading anti-Mormon participants, but no Hiram. (Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Humphrey possibly confused one of the two Standleys with Hiram Wilcoxson, another Carrollton vigilante.
57. Brown petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 426.
58. The HC under the date of October 2 states: “The mob pressed harder upon De Witt and fired upon the Saints.” (HC 3:85.)
59. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Henry Root filed an affidavit on October 3, stating the anti- Mormon forces made their initial attack on De Witt the day before. (See Henry Root to David R. Atchison, 3 October 1838, in Document, 35.)
60. Murdock, “Journal,” 20.
61. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. John Murdock believed the vigilante forces retreated because they believed the Mormons outnumbered them. “About 30 of their men . . . ran in the woods to the other end of their line and came in contact with 10 of our men, under Captain Surley, who were in ambush, behind a big log . . . and they ran back swearing the Mormons were surrounding them, jumping over into the cornfield, and this scared the rest and they followed suit, and away went the whole 150, that were able to run from 30.” (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)
62. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. George W. G. Averett, a Latter-day Saint, was familiar with the incident and added a few details. “One of the mobbers . . . approaching the night guard . . . while on duty and firing their guns at him without affect and breaking [in]to [a] run . . . [the guard] fired his gun at one of them striking him near the mouth, and to use the language of [the Mormon guard] he made the mobber call on his God he thought for the first time in his whole lifetime, and it was stated that [the guard] shot his chew of tobacco out of his mouth.” (George W. G. Averett, “Biographical Sketch of George Washington Gill Averett,” typescript, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 5). Averett identified the Mormon guard as a man by the name of Williams when in fact Williams was the Missourian who was shot at.
63. Henry Root to David R. Atchison, 3 October 1838, in Document, 35; also in HC 3:149. The letter is actually an affidavit, filed in Richmond but addressed to Atchison. The document is important since it indicated the vigilante forces converged upon De Witt on the evening of October 1, then attacked on the morning of the October 2.
64. John Murdock stated, “about the 2nd or 3rd of Oct . . . we Sent Henry Root to Judg[e] King.” (Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504; see also Murdock, “Journal,” 20.) Joseph Smith indicated, “Judge King was also petitioned to afford us some assistance: He sent a company of about 100 men.” (Smith petition, in Mormon Redress Petitions, 347.) John Taylor wrote that Root was sent to meet with King, but incorrectly gave the date of his departure as being October 6. (See Taylor, A Short Account, 3.)
65. David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 5 October 1838, in Document, 35. The correspondence between Parks and Atchison is included in Henry Root’s 3 October 1838 letter-affidavit to Atchison. (See Ibid, 35–36; also HC 3:149–150.)
66. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504. Murdock indicated Caldwell left around October 2–3. (See also Rigdon petition in Ibid, 667; also in HC 3:451; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 39; and Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 1:214.) The date of Caldwell’s dispatch is cited in the HC under the date of October 6, and after Joseph Smith’s arrival in the community, but this date would be incorrect since he left several days earlier. The man was likely A. L. Caldwell whose name appears on the September 22 petition to the governor. Jessee and LeSueur incorrectly identify him as A. C. Caldwell. (See Jessee, Ibid, 1:214 note; and LeSueur, The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 105.)
67. Lilburn W. Boggs to the Missouri State House of Representatives, 5 December 1838, in Document, 14. In an October 9 letter to the governor, Atchison made mention of the fact that Boggs had been in St. Louis. (David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 9 October 1838, in Ibid, 38; see also Corrill, A Brief History, 35–36.)
68. Murdock, “Journal,” 20.
69. Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470.
70. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
71. Ibid. Blackwell estimated between four and five hundred men had assembled to go against the Mormons, whereas most other sources indicate around three hundred. (See Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, in Document, 37.) Parks indicated Austin was still commanding the anti-Mormon forces.
72. William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838; and Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, in Document, 37. Only two Missourians sustained injuries in the De Witt conflict—Gentry, the man accidentally wounded by one of his comrades in the nighttime raid, and the man from Saline. (See Arthur I. H. Bradford to Thomas Bradford, 14 October 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 115.)
73. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Of the three hundred men, approximately half were citizens of Carroll and half from other counties.
74. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:451. See also John Thorp petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 548. Christopher Merkley, a Canadian emigrant, lost a mare during the siege and made an attempt to leave the community in order to find the animal. He was accosted by a heavily armed band who made several threats against his life. They also interrogated him, asking several times how many men were defending De Witt. He was eventually released unharmed. (See Merkley, Biography of Christopher Merkley, 4–6.)
75. See Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666–68; also in HC 3:451–52. Rigdon further stated that because the Mormons killed the strays that came into the community, they were accused of stealing and plundering.
76. Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, Document, 37; also in HC 3:155–56.
77. Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, Document, 37–38; also in HC 3:155–56.
78. David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 9 October 1838, in Document, 38.
79. Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 38; Amasa Mason Lyman, “Amasa Lyman’s History,” Millennial Star 27 (19 August 1865): 20. Exactly when Wilcoxson returned to Carrollton with the cannon is not known. However, William F. Dunnica, the Howard representative, writing from Carroll County on October 7, and Hiram Parks, writing to Atchison on the same day both stated the weapon was in the possession of the vigilantes. (See William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838; and Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, in Document, 37.)
80. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
81. According to the Prophet’s history, while he was engaged in locating a site for a new settlement in southern Caldwell County, his company was met by a messenger came from De Witt who informed him about the difficulties the Saints were operating under in the settlement. (See Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 1:213; and Joseph Smith petition, in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 346–47.)
82. Rockwood, “Journal,” 21; see also HC 3:152–53; and Hales, “Autobiography,” 34. James Mulholland, a clerk employed to keep the Prophet’s history, recorded under the date of October 5: “Saw him early in the morning say 7 o[’]clock, again about 10 o[’]clock, did not see him all the afternoon, understood that he went from home.” (Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 2:307.) It apparently took a few days to make preparations to leave which explains the October 5 departure date. (See Ibid, 1:213; and Joseph Smith petition, in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 346–47.) In his history of the De Witt conflict, A. C. Blackwell indicated Lyman Wight was the leading member of the relief party. Furthermore, he made no mention of Joseph Smith. (See Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Joseph Thorp, an early resident of the Grand River region, also speaks of Wight’s presence. (See Thorp, Early Days In the West Along the Missouri One Hundred Years Ago [Liberty, Missouri: Irving Gilmer Publisher, 1924], 85; first published as part of a continuing series, “Early Days in Missouri,” in the Liberty Tribune, 2 November 1883. Thorp mistakenly refers to Wight as Wright.) Perkins maintains this was an error and contends the writer must have confused Joseph Smith with being Lyman Wight. (See Perkins, “De Witt: Prelude to Expulsion,” 297, note #50.) I maintain that because Wight held a military commission, and because of his military expertise, he went to De Witt in order to lend assistance.
83. Rockwood, “Journal,” 21. Rockwood indicated that when Brunson’s company approached the community they were hailed by the mob but passed on and arrived in safety. (Ibid.) Concerning Joseph Smith’s group Reed Peck wrote, “The presidency with a large company of volunteers hastened to Dewitt and were permitted to enter the town without opposition though they passed in view of the mob. . . . The mob knew that people of other counties would render them all necessary assistance to accomplish their object therefore they did not fear the strength of Caldwell County.” (Peck, “Manuscript,” 17–18; see also Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:451.)
84. Merkley, Biography of Christopher Merkley, 4. In an October 7 letter signed by several vigilantes from Howard County, they indicated the Caldwell reinforcements numbered sixty-two. (See Document, 40.)
85. Adam C. Woods statement in Document, 40–41; see also HC 3:157.
86. Letter to the Citizens of Howard County, 7 October 1838, in Document, 40; see also HC 3:156.
87. Dunnica is the source stating there were six emissaries, but other than himself he does not identify them. (See William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838.) The names of the other representatives were obtained from other sources. (See “Report of the Committee of Chariton County,” 5 October 1838, in Document, 36; Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13; and Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 40.) Isaac Leany stated the Mormons sent a request to Chariton officials requesting they send representatives to investigate the disturbances. (Leany petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 480.)
88. Report of the Committee of Chariton County, 5 October 1838, in Document, 36.
89. William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838; and Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
90. HC 3:158. See Root, Smith, Leany, and Murdock petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 332, 347, 480, and 504. Warren Foote wrote, “The militia, (who were Missourians), were called out, but they took sides with the mob.” (Foote, “Autobiography, 24.)
91. Edward Lampkin to Thomas Bradford, 14 October 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor, Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 135.
92. Stevenson, “Life and History,” 90; see also HC 3:158.
93. Joseph Smith, “Extract, From the Private Journal of Joseph Smith, Jr.” Times and Seasons 1 (November 1839): 3. See also HC 3:157; Joseph Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347; Taylor, A Short Account, 3–4; and Rigdon An Appeal to the American People, 39. One press report indicated a messenger bearing dispatches arrived in Jefferson City to meet with the governor around October 6. This may have been Mr. Caldwell. (See Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838.) John Corrill later stated the governor denied telling the Mormons they would have to fight it out, but expected the militia officers would settle the difficulties. (See Corrill, A Brief History, 35–36.)
94. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Rigdon indicated at this time Root and Thomas solicited the Saints to give up and leave. Furthermore, Thomas said he had received assurances from the vigilantes that if they left they would not be harmed and they would be reimbursed for all their losses. (Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 40.)
95. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.
96. Leany petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 480–81.
97. Hinkle turned the sword over to Sashiel Woods. The sword was reported to have been in the possession of the Masonic Lodge in Carrollton. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 138, note #1; also “Rev. Sashiel Woods, Extremist!” in Ray County Mirror 6 [29 September 1979]: 9.)
98. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Blackwell wrote that just before the meeting was to be held, a message was received from the Mormons indicating they had decided to retain possession of their Carroll County property. (Ibid, 14.) Before leaving the state Murdock delivered up the deed to the De Witt property, but he did not clearly indicate whether or not he was reimbursed for the property. (See Murdock, “Journal,” 22.)
99. Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 215; also HC 3:158. John Murdock recognized there was a numerical disparity against the Latter-day Saints, although his estimates were undoubtedly incorrect. He wrote, “after maintaining our ground and holding the place about 10 days, against a force 8–10 times our number, we were forced, contrary to the law of the land, or any just right, of either God or man, to surrender the place. (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)
100. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 667–668, also in HC 3:451–52; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 39. See also Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347; Jesse Papers of Joseph Smith 1:215; and HC 3:158.
101. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504; see also William Hawk petition in Ibid, 228; also HC 4:58. Both Sidney Rigdon and Joseph Smith stated there were members of the community who died under the adverse circumstances although there is no evidence in any other sources to substantiate this. (See references under previous footnote.)
102. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504.
103. Boggs to the House of Representatives of the State of Missouri, 5 December 1838, in Document, 14. LeSueur suggested several possible reasons why Boggs did not get involved: (1) he possibly experienced embarrassment after having called out several thousand militia during the September disturbances in Daviess, which troops proved not to be needed; (2) Atchison successfully resolved the Daviess problems without him; and (3) coming out against the actions of the vigilantes would be unpopular, thus harming him politically. (LeSueur, The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 108.)
104. HC 3:159; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 40; Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504; Humphrey petition in Ibid, 470.
105. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. A few Mormons were detained or unprepared and not able to leave with the main group. Charles H. Hales wrote, “I did not leave DeWitt quite as soon as the rest of the brethren as I stayed behind to assist one of my Canadian brethren, who was not quite ready when the rest were. We, however, calculated to overtake them soon, but one of his horses gave out, and he was compelled to stay. I was then under the necessity of going to Far West on foot, and alone, since he, himself, gave up the idea of going.” (Hales, “Autobiography,” 34.)
106. Judd, “Autobiography,” 9.
107. Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347; also Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 1:215.
108. William F. Dunnica letter, 12 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 18 October 1838.
109. Judd, “Autobiography,” 9. Whereas Judd states the woman’s name was Downey, the Prophet’s history indicates her name was Jensen. (HC 3:159–60.) This is an obvious error. The surname is of Scandinavian origin and no individuals with that last name were known to have been church members during the Missouri period. (See Jensen surname entries in Black, Membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1848, 25:453–56.) Whereas Judd indicates the woman was older, other sources state the reason for her infirmity was due to a recent childbirth. (Avery petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 128; Rigdon petition in Ibid, 668; also in HC 3:452–53; and HC 3:159–60.) Although Joseph Smith’s history states there were several who died (see HC 3:160; Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 215–16; and Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347), the majority of sources indicate the woman was the lone fatality. (See Avery, Humphrey, Leany, and Murdock petitions in Ibid, 128, 471, 481, 504.)
110. Judd, “Autobiography,” 9–10.
111. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504. Under this date Warren Foote wrote, “[October] 14th. On our way home from meeting, we met several families from DeWitt, just getting in, amongst whom was S. Markham, and company, whom we left in Illinois. They were among those that were detained at DeWitt by the mob. During the skirmish there, Markham was shot at several times, but not hurt.” (Foote, “Autobiography,” 25.)


