BYU Studies Logo

Chapter 6: The Mormon Defense of De Witt

The first sustained confrontation against the Mormons in the 1838 conflict occurred at the isolated town of De Witt, situated in the lower southeastern section of Carroll County, just above the Missouri River, a few miles west of the conflux of the Grand, and approximately seventy miles from Far West. Beginning in August, and lasting until nearly mid-October (with only a short reprieve in September), Mormon settlers succeeded in defending their community from county regulators intent on their expulsion. However, in the end, nearly seventy Latter-day Saint families were forced to abandon their homes and property.1 [143]

 

The Mormon Acquisition of De Witt

On April 1, just two weeks after Joseph Smith’s arrival at Far West in March 1838, he was visited by Henry Root, a merchant and landowner from Carroll County. Root presented the Church president with a letter of introduction from David Thomas, who also possessed extensive land holdings in Carroll. Both men were cognizant of the fact that the Mormons had been emigrating to Missouri for a number of years and saw them as potential buyers and settlers. In the letter, Thomas indicated that he owned 1,600 acres which he proposed selling to the Church for $4,000 and extolled the virtues of the location and the benefits it would afford the Latter-day Saints. Root also proposed his own land sale. However, with more pressing matters facing the Church, particularly from the dissension being generated by the Whitmers, Cowderys and others, it appears Church leaders considered the prospects of a future settlement in Carrollton County, but took no action.2

On April 2, the day following his interview with the Mormon leader at Far West, Root also had a chance meeting with the Prophet’s first counselor. Sidney Rigdon, who was moving from Ohio to Missouri, was on the final leg of his journey and had stopped over for the night at a house [144] in Carroll County. Rigdon later remembered the informal discussion he had with the landowner. “He had been to Far West to get some of those who were coming into that place to form a settlement at De Witt,” wrote Sidney. “Speaking highly of the advantage of the [location] and soliciting my interference in his behalf to obtain a number of families to commence at that place, as he was a large proprietor [of] the town plat, he offered a liberal share in all the profits which might arise from the sale of property there to thos[e] who would aid him in getting the place settled.”3

Several weeks after his first visit to Far West, Root approached the Mormon leadership again, this time in company with Thomas. On this occasion, a deal was struck, apparently with Root for his De Witt property, but no agreement was made to acquire Thomas’ holdings.4 On June 23, George M. Hinkle and John Murdock, two members of the Missouri high council, traveled to the community to make payment to the seller. Under this date Murdock wrote, “George M. Hinkle and myself, being sent by the High Council, by direction of Brother Joseph the Prophet, bought the undivided half of the town plot of Dewitt, Car[r]oll County, Missouri, for five hundred dollars, giving our note for the same, Bishop Partri[d]ge being our endorser.”5 Transferal of the property took place around the first of July and consisted of 134 of the town’s 304 lots.6 [145]

Why did LDS leaders agree to the De Witt purchase? The answer may lie in the fact that the establishment of a Mormon colony in the region offered at least two strategic advantages to the Latter-day Saints. First, Church members emigrating to Missouri frequently traveled by water up the Missouri or by various overland routes that generally ran near the river proper. Mormon leaders perceived that De Witt could serve as a port of entry for emigrating Saints before proceeding on to the main Mormon settlements to the north. In addition, agricultural products and goods could be transported to and from the Mormon settlements in Caldwell and Daviess by way of De Witt and the Grand River.7 These plans appear to have been known among the local inhabitants. A. C. Blackwell, a long-time resident of the county and later an active vigilante participant remembered, “De Witt being a good landing on the river, [was] the most convenient point from which to forward goods and emigrants to Far West, a Mormon settlement already established in Caldwell County, and then the head centre of Mormonism.”8

The Mormons viewed Root’s offer and sale as an open invitation for immigration and settlement in the region and during the first part of July Mormon families immediately began [146] relocating there. John Murdock was one of the first to move.9 George M. Hinkle, a commissioned colonel in the state militia, moved sometime before July 6 and was appointed president of the branch.10 Although the Mormons were generally optimistic about the future of their new colony, the local population was generally opposed to the Mormon arrival and opposition against them was swift and immediate, resulting in the first military operation in the history of the county.11 In less than four months, civil strife and armed conflict generated by their presence would force the Mormons to abandon De Witt altogether.

 

Opposition to the Mormon Settlement at De Witt

Antagonism against the Mormons and their new settlement was especially concentrated in Carrollton, the county seat, located fifteen miles west of De Witt. Word that the Latter-day Saints had bought property and were moving into the county spread quickly. Handbills were circulated calling for a public meeting to be held in Carrollton to discuss the Mormon situation. The meeting convened on Monday, July 30.12 During the hearing a decision was made to organize a committee, [147] comprised of Abbot Hancock, Samuel H. Williams, and John Smart. The committee was instructed to discuss with Henry Root and David Thomas the actions taken by them in inviting the Mormons to settle in De Witt. Furthermore, they were assigned to inform the Saints that the citizens had requested that they leave the county.13 Although not cited in the published report, Blackwell indicated that an additional proposition was made. Election day was scheduled for Monday, August 6, and to be “democratic,” a decision was made to let voters decide whether or not the Mormons should be permitted to settle in the county. Joseph Dickson, the county clerk was then instructed to include “two additional columns on the poll book, . . . one ‘for’ and the other ‘against’ the Mormons, so that an expression of the people of the County might be arrived at.”14

According to John Murdock, around the last of July the Carrollton committee went to De Witt and ordered them to leave the county by August 7. Murdock gave no other indications concerning what else was discussed, but the Mormons made it clear that they were not about to accede to the request.15 The Carrollton men also met with Henry Root, who defended the right of the Saints to settle De Witt. Root also warned the committee that if the citizens attempted to [148] drive the Mormons out of the county, they would call upon Church members living in Far West to come their assistance.16

On August 7, a second public meeting was held. Great excitement prevailed, and the meeting was well attended. The committee reported that they had met with the Mormon leaders at De Witt who informed them that they were determined to remain in Carroll County. With the election being concluded the day previous, the results of the poll were also given. After it was found that the poll books showed only six or eight votes had been cast in favor of allowing the Latter-day Saints to remain in the county, it was decided to take more decisive action to bring about their removal.17

Through the influence of William W. Austin, who organized the second meeting and who emerged as the leading spokesman for the Carrollton County regulators (Austin would shortly be pressed to go to Daviess County to direct the multi-county anti-Mormon forces), a five-man “committee of safety” was appointed to draft several resolutions concerning what action would be taken. The committee, consisting of Austin (who was appointed chairman), Edmund J. Rea, William Freeman, Hiram Wilcoxson, and Abbot Hancock, with A. C. Blackwell appointed as secretary, charged that the Mormons were guilty of violating the agreement to confine themselves to Caldwell County. Believing they had no right to settle in Carroll, the committee justified full-scale expulsion. The Presbyterian minister Sashel Woods was assigned the responsibility of informing Hinkle and the Mormons that they would be given a short amount of time to relocate peaceably, after which they would be forcibly removed. The committee also realized that the De Witt Saints would likely be reinforced with Mormon troops from Caldwell and Daviess, so they [149] requested permission to correspond with the citizens in nearby Howard, Saline, Chariton, Ray, and Clay counties to seek assistance in carrying out the expulsion operation.18

The expulsionist attitude that prevailed in Carroll County is reflected in two letters written by Carrollton residents. A few days following the August 7 town meeting, one local citizen wrote, “We are getting into trouble with the Mormons our neighbors. They now occupy mostly two counties adjoining us & are coming into the country in droves, & attempting to settle in the adjoining counties much to the dissatisfaction of the inhabitants & they [the local citizens] are calling meetings & appointing committees inviting them to leave & saying if they refuse to do so peaceably other measures will be resorted to.”19 Arthur Bradford, also a Carrollton citizen, [150] expressed the view that the Mormons had violated the agreement not to settle outside Caldwell. “There is a considerable stir in this and the adjoining counties at this time in regard to a sect who call themselves Mormons,” he wrote. “There are several families of them who have[,] contrary to the expressed wish of the citizens of this county settled in it.”20

 

Outbreak of Hostilities

Within two weeks following Carrollton’s expulsion meeting, the local civilians organized and began implementing their plans to bring about Mormon removal. Smith Humphrey, a Latter-day Saint who lived some distance from the Mormon settlement, wrote “on the morning of the 19th of August 1838 I being in Dewitt I was returning home & was met by an armed force of men I supposed nearly one hundred Commanded by Colonel [William Claude] Jones [and Sashel Woods] & by force took & kept me a prisoner about two hours during which time they made many threats against the people called Mormons Such as that they were determined to drive them from that Co[unty].”21 On the same day Humphrey was accosted, Pierce Hawley, another Latter-day Saint, experienced similar treatment at the hands of the same group of Carroll ruffians. John Murdock reported that on August 20 a very much frightened Hawley came wandering into De Witt. “He had been a prisoner all night by a mob of 60 or 70, who were within 4 miles of town,” he wrote. Hawley believed the belligerents would soon enter the town and he feared for the safety of the community. Robert Seely, apparently a non-Mormon but also a friend to the Saints, rode out to investigate. He found the militant band had in their company the county sheriff with a warrant, filed by Sashel Woods, for the arrest of Colonel Hinkle. Seely was able to reach an agreement [151] with Jones and Woods for the sheriff go to De Witt by himself so as not to alarm or frighten the women and children. Seely accompanied the sheriff into the town, the officer made the arrest, then took Hinkle to appear before a justice five miles away.22

Hawley’s prediction that the armed rabble would come into De Witt and threaten the settlement was realized. In fact, it appears that Woods may have even concocted the scheme to get Hinkle out of the community so he could intimidate and harass the Mormon citizens. “I[m]mediately when the Sherif[f] & prisoner [Hinkle] left town Colonel Jones at the head of I suppose near a hundred armed men entered town accompanied by Seciel [Sashel] Wood,” Murdock recalled.23 Since Hawley had given them some forewarning, when the Carroll company rode into the settlement, between forty and fifty men had formed a line and were prepared to meet them.24 Knowing that the Mormon troops were not only outnumbered but leaderless, with Hinkle absent, the Carroll contingent “in a verry [sic] hostile manner Paraded through the town at least two or three hours threat[e]ning men women & children with destruction of person & property if they were not out of the County in ten days.”25 Meanwhile, Hinkle went to appear before a Carroll [152] County justice, but since Woods did not appear to give testimony, the Mormon colonel was acquitted and returned to De Witt.26

When Hinkle returned, he was surprised to find the community overrun by raiders. Sashel Woods informed the Mormon leader that he had been sent by the local citizen’s committee to inform him that his people would be given ten days to leave the county. Following that time, Murdock reported, “if we were not away in that time they would exterminate us without regard to age or sex and throw our property into the river.”27 Upon learning of their options, Hinkle “drew his sword and flourished it in the air with threats of extermination toward those who should attempt to disturb his peace.” Recognizing that he held a distinct numerical advantage, Woods coolly replied, “Colonel, put up your sword, I am an old pioneer, have heard the Indians yell, wolves howl, the owls hoot, and I am not alarmed at such demonstrations.”28 With their message delivered, and confident in their intimidation, the Missourians left town discharging their guns, hooting and howling like wild savages.29

John Taylor, a future apostle of the Church from Canada, was in De Witt at the time the Carroll County vigilantes went to issue their August ultimatum. He was astounded when he discovered who was directing the opposition. “This was the first mob I had ever seen,” he remembered, “and the whole affair was new to me, especially when I considered the kind of officers [the mob] had.” Referring to Sashel Woods and Abbot Hancock, both Protestant preachers, Taylor remarked, “I had heretofore looked upon gospel ministers as messengers of [153] peace; here they came not only in a war-like capacity, but as the leaders of an armed mob—a gang of marauders and free-booters, with the avowed object of driving peaceful citizens—men, women, and children, from their homes.” Taylor, a Canadian citizen en route from Ohio to Far West, assumed that in coming to Missouri he needed no arms since he was in what he presumed was a “civilized Christian land.” Despite being opposed to violence and nursing an injured arm, he later confessed that he, “threw off the sling and bandages from my lame arm, suppressed my repugnance to fighting, borrowed a gun, bought a brace of pistols, and prepared myself at least for defensive measures.”30

Being forewarned by the Carrollton delegation, the Mormon community braced themselves for the assault they anticipated would begin in late August or early September. However, in the meantime, Carroll’s citizens received reports indicating that Mormon troops were about to overrun Daviess County. Requests by the local Daviess residents for additional manpower prompted Carrollton leaders to temporarily postpone the siege of De Witt in order to go to the aid of their fellow Missourians. W. W. Austin personally directed the contingent of men who went from Carroll, and upon their arrival in Daviess, was designated as the overall commander of the multi-county vigilante forces. [154]

Austin and his detachment, most of whom were Carrollton citizens, were absent from the county from about September 1 until September 19. It was at that time that General Atchison disbanded and disbursed the Daviess vigilantes as well as the Mormon forces and ordered both groups to return to their respective homes and counties. However, in spite of the commander’s orders, Austin and his multi-county community forces did not completely breakup. The Carrollton corps, along with a company from neighboring Saline County under the leadership of Captain Singleton Vaughn, returned to the Carroll county where they set up camp on property owned by a Mr. Cross, about a mile west of De Witt, and prepared for an assault on the Saints’ settlement if the Mormons continued to refuse to evacuate.31

On September 20, Austin and his band of community forces consisting of approximately 100–150 men, rode into De Witt where he met with Hinkle and informed him once again that he had ten days in order to make up his mind to leave peaceably or suffer the consequences.32 The Mormon commander’s response to his perpetrators was that he would “be at his post and prepared to extend a hearty reception.”33 [155]

Significantly, non-Mormons living in or near De Witt who were perceived to be Mormon sympathizers were also advised at this time to discontinue their association with the Latter-day Saints. For example, in September, Elizabeth Smith, a non-Mormon widow living in De Witt, received a letter from the citizens of the county warning her to leave the community without delay, promising she and her family would not be harmed if she complied. The letter reads:

Dear Madam: You are advised by the citizens of Carroll County to leave De Witt forthwith and all the citizens of that place who are determined not to take part with the Mormons, as a state of things will exist there in a few days that if any of the friends of the people of Carroll should be injured, [it] would be extremely painful to them. You will, therefore, with all our people who do not take sides with the Mormons, immediately, on the reception of this communication, leave that place, and you shall be protected by us at the risk of our lives and fortunes. Show this to all the people of your town as soon as it comes to hand, that they may have an opportunity to leave the place before things come to extremities, which is at hand. We are determined that not one Mormon shall live in this county, be the issue what it may, and when we come to De Witt, we want our friends out of it.

We are, Madam, very respectfully, your friends,

The Citizens of Carroll

In spite of the warning, Elizabeth Smith chose to remain in the Mormon community.34

Emos McNell and Thomas Hollinshead, two non-Mormons who had purchased farmland adjacent to the Mormon community, experienced harsh treatment at the hands of the local regulators because of their association with the Saints. At the time McNell lived in De Witt, he [156] did not profess any religion but was nonetheless notified he had to leave along with them. Shortly thereafter, he went to Carrollton to purchase some provisions for his family when he was seized and committed to prison for seven days. “I was taken sick in Jail,” he stated, “and suffer[e]d a great deal and they would not let me out, till I agreed to leave the Sta[te], they then gave me a pass to be out of the Co. in 24 hours or be shot which I did at the loss of my property.”35 Thomas Hollinshead experienced similar treatment. He was forced from his home by a group of men from Carroll county and also put in the county prison. Following a week of confinement, he was given strict orders he had only one day to leave the county or suffer further repercussions.36

Between September 20 and October 1, the Mormons dug in and made defensive preparations. Men were put to work fortifying the log homes, temporary breastworks were constructed (some out of their wagons), sentinels were posted in order to observe enemy movements and advances, and tactical defense locations were established in the heavy timber located south of the town.37 Hinkle also organized the men along military lines and appointed [157] officers and sub-commanders.38 With their leader being a commissioned colonel in the state militia, the Mormons clearly viewed their actions and defensive measures as being lawful and warranted.

The besieged Mormons also sought to inform Governor Boggs of their situation and condition and wrote a written request asking that he intervene. On September 22, a petition was written and signed by fifty members of the De Witt community. The letter informed the chief executive that their antagonists threatened them to leave the county by October 1, and requested he importune and “take such steps, as shall put a stop to all lawless proceedings.” Included on the petition were the signatures of the Henry Root and David Thomas.39

Sometime during the last week of September, Mormon numbers in De Witt were augmented by the arrival of a group of Canadian Mormons consisting of some thirty families under the leadership of John E. Page.40 Upon their arrival, Hinkle requested they remain to assist them in the defense of the town. One member of the company, Charles Henry Hales, clearly had [158] intentions of going on to Far West, until, as he wrote, “on coming to DeWitt I was requested to stay by George M. Hinkle, who was president of the Branch. I was asked to assist them in defending the place as they were threatened with the mob.”41 Zadok Judd, who was only ten years old when his family arrived in Missouri, had vivid memories of scenes and incidents upon their arrival at De Witt. He remembered being impressed by the beauty and abundant resources of the entire area. “The location seemed to please our company,” but that was not the main reason his father chose to remain. “I think all concluded to stop and our presence and help was much needed to strengthen and build up the place.”42

The Merkley’s, another Canadian family who were part of Page’s company, had been detained in Illinois because of illness and arrived a few days after the main group. Shortly after their arrival, Elder Page informed Christopher Merkley concerning the unsettled state of affairs and the preparations being made to defend the community. He also instructed him to make at least fifty balls for his rifle. Being pacifist by nature, he initially refused to do as he was directed. However, by week’s end, he was shouldering his weapon along with the rest.43 The arrival of the [159] Canadians during the last week of September brought the number of Mormon families living in De Witt to between seventy and eighty.44

On September 30, the day before the planned assault on the town, George A. Smith, his cousin Don Carlos (younger brother to the Mormon Prophet), Lorenzo Barnes, and Harrison Sagers made a brief unexpected visit to the Mormon community. The four men had recently been called to serve short- term missions in the east to raise money to buy out the non-Mormons in Daviess County and were headed to St. Louis on board the Kansas. After boarding at the Richmond landing earlier in the day, the steamer made a brief stop at De Witt. During their layover, the missionaries held a brief meeting with Colonel Hinkle. “We found about seventy Saints [families] surrounded by a mob of 200 men, who threatened their extermination the next day,” wrote George A. Smith.45 “We would have stopped, and assisted them what we could,” Don Carlos Smith stated, “but we were unarmed, and, upon consulting together, it was thought advisable for us to fulfil our mission, so we returned to the boat, and proceeded on our journey.”46 [160]

Even more significant than the visit of the four Mormon elders was the fact that also on board were a number of troops and several leading officers in the regional militia, including, Samuel Lucas and Moses Wilson (both generals) from Jackson County, a Colonel Thompson from Platt, and Major General David R. Atchison, who, less than two weeks previous had secured the temporary peace between the Mormons and non-Mormons in Daviess County. George A. Smith indicated that these officers were en route to Columbia for the court martial of a Major General Powell who was being charged with drunkenness while on parade.47 Hinkle took the opportunity to meet with some of these men in order to inform them of the current circumstances surrounding the plight of the Latter-day Saint community. During the course of their conversation, the Mormon colonel “bristled up courage to make a speech to the military officers, in which he declared his intention in a trembling tone to defend DeWitt to the last.”48 Lucas later issued a report to the governor concerning what they had observed and learned while at De Witt. “As we passed down the Missouri River, . . . we saw a large force of Mormons at De Witt in Carroll county, under arms. Their commander, Col. Hinkle, . . . informed me that there were two hundred, and that they were hourly expecting an attack form the citizens of Carroll. . . . Hinkle said they had determined to fight.” Lucas also expressed his concern that if any of Carroll’s citizens should be killed by the Mormons, several thousand volunteers would immediately respond [161] against them and “nothing but their blood will satisfy them.” The general could not, however, suggest any course of action the chief-of-state might pursue.49

Meanwhile, the anti-Mormon regulators made final preparations and positioned themselves for the October 1 offensive. Following the arrival of the Canadian Saints in late September, a primary objective was to impede and turn away any incoming Mormon immigrants, as well as to prevent supplies and reinforcements from arriving from Caldwell and Daviess counties.50 While the main encampment of the local anti-Mormon troops was situated west of the town, another contingent was organized and placed to the east, on the opposite side of the Grand River, to prevent any crossing by the Mormons into neighboring Saline County.51 Word was also dispatched to neighboring counties requesting reinforcements and volunteers. In addition, Hiram Wilcoxson, a Carrollton resident and a member of the five-man committee of safety, was sent to Jackson County to procure a small cannon to be used to batter Mormon log homes. “Affairs began to wear a serious aspect and work was begun in earnest,” wrote A. C. Blackwell, “Timber was hewn, cartridges prepared, and in anticipation of the coming artillery, log chains were cut up, together with rod iron, to serve as projectiles.”52

By month’s end, with the October 1 deadline approaching, a full-scale contest appeared to be inevitable and both sides braced for the worst. Mounting tensions and fears, especially among the local public, generated rumors, false reports, and to some degree, panic. Writing from [162] Carrollton during the last week of September Edward Lampkin indicated “some of the citizens of Carroll have become so much alarmed as to sell their farms at less than half that they could have got for them one year ago, and a great many others intend leaving the county.”53

 

The Siege, October 1–10

With the arrival of the October 1 deadline and no sign that the Mormons were willing to evacuate, the county vigilantes set about to enforce removal. “About the first of Oct we began to be harassed by day & by night by Scouting parties of the mob in & about Dewitt,” wrote John Murdock.54 The first targets were those Latter-day Saints living outside the main Mormon settlement. “The attack was made on De Witt by taking Elder [Smith] Humphrey[’]s family and burning his house,” wrote Albert Rockwood, “he lived about 1½ miles from the landing.”55 Early on the morning of October 1, when Humphrey went out to his stables, he found the structures had been torched during the night. Shortly thereafter he was confronted by twelve men, commanded by Captain Hiram Standley. The band took him back to his home where he was ordered to remove his belongings from the house after which “in the presence of my self & family Set fire to & burned my two blocks of houses my wife being sick with the ague . . . I was then compelled with my family to move into the town of Dewitt.”56 About this same time a body of [163] armed men went to the home of Mary Brown and ordered her family to leave by the next morning. Perhaps because her husband was ill, no other actions were perpetrated against them, but the Brown family left the following day. Rather than move into De Witt, somehow they were able to make their way into Saline County, where her husband died shortly thereafter.57

Removal of the entire De Witt community proved to be considerably more difficult. With the Latter-day Saints essentially hemmed in, the first operation of the Carroll volunteers involved approximately 150 men from the main encampment west of De Witt and focused on testing the strength of Mormon resistance.58 Around ten a.m. on the morning of Tuesday, October 2, the Missouri company proceeded into town on the main road. On the outskirts of the community they were fired upon by Mormon pickets who were secluded in the brush and a nearby ravine. Advancing further, the vigilante forces approached the main Mormon breastwork, established their position, and began returning fire.59 John Murdock wrote that on this occasion the Mormon troops numbered only about thirty men. “We exchanged shots with them about ½ hour,” he [164] recalled, “but a deep ravine and a good many tree tops lay between us and them, . . . they were some 30–40 rods from us in the woods.”60

From where they were situated, the Carroll and Saline forces were able to observe the Mormon commander (more than likely, Hinkle), “passing to and fro, . . . encouraging the men to stand firm, and giving directions to shoot low,” A. C. Blackwell remembered. “A call was made for several sharp-shooters to step forward and silence the Mormon officer . . . who could plainly be heard encouraging his men to stand their ground.” Four men volunteered and moved up to a position forty feet closer, where a better view could be had, from which they sent a volley into the Mormon works. “The officer who had been displaying so much activity was seen to leap from his position and press his hand to his side; and soon afterward the whole body of Mormons evacuated their works, and fled to some log houses in which they found themselves comparatively safe from attack.” In spite of their apparent success, the resistance generated by the Mormon troops led those in charge of the county forces to conclude additional men would be necessary in order to subdue the Mormons. A decision was therefore made to return to camp to await reinforcements from the surrounding counties.61 There were no serious casualties reported on either side, but a man named Williams, a member of the vigilante forces from Saline County, had a close scrape. “He was an inveterate tobacco chewer, and was in the habit of constantly keeping a quid between his under lip and teeth,” a comrade recalled. “He had just fired his gun, and had stepped aside to reload . . . . [when] a small ball from the enemy entered the right side of his lip, [165] and coming out on the left, carried with it the unfortunate chew of tobacco, without [even] breaking the skin in front of the mouth.”62

With the attack on the settlement underway, the Mormons took steps to secure assistance from the civil and state authorities. Immediately following the initial assault, Henry Root was dispatched to Richmond to deliver messages and to ask for aid in behalf of the Mormons. In leaving the besieged community, the De Witt developer successfully avoided detection and arrived in the Ray County seat on the evening of October 2, or the following day.63 In Richmond, Root sought out circuit court Judge Austin A. King. Upon being informed about the situation, the magistrate authorized the militia to intervene.64 Word about the situation at De Witt was immediately sent to Brigadier General Hiram G. Parks, still stationed with his Ray County peace-keeping force in Daviess County. Because of the seriousness of the situation, Parks immediately left the Grand River region, taking with him two companies of Ray militia under the command of [166] Captain Samuel Bogart and a Captain Houston, and proceeded to Carroll County, leaving a Colonel Thomas in charge in Daviess. He also sent an express to General Atchison explaining his actions. Word reached Atchison on October 5, whereupon he informed Governor Boggs of Park’s movements.65

About the same time Root went to petition Judge Austin King, a man named Caldwell, an old settler in the De Witt region who owned a ferry on the lower Grand River, volunteered to go to Jefferson City to seek assistance from the governor in behalf of the Mormons.66 De Witt’s leaders were obviously perplexed as to why Boggs had not responded to their September 22 entreaty. However, it was not known at that time that the chief executive was in St. Louis and could not respond.67

During the ten-day standoff, the Mormons never knew when they would be attacked and were on constant alert. “I was continually employed, day and night, guarding,” wrote John Murdock. Even when he wasn’t on duty, he went from one sentinel to another “to keep them to [167] their duty.”68 Smith Humphrey stated that the vigilantes “continuealy [sic] harras[s]ed us by night & by day firing at our men where ever they had a chance.”69 During one nighttime operation, a local volunteer was injured by friendly fire. Joseph Ewing, a citizen of Ray County, was selected to lead a small squadron to capture a Mormon sentry whose position had been discovered. Some over-anxious citizens however, upon learning of the operation, desired to participate and went on their own to the appointed location where the strike would occur, arriving at the position ahead of Ewing’s party. When Ewing and his men approached, they mistook the local citizens for Mormons and fired upon the group, wounding one of their number, a man named Gentry. The confusion alerted the Mormon picket and he escaped back to the Mormon camp.70

Within three days after the attack on the community began, a multi-county volunteer force consisting of approximately three hundred men had assembled in the main vigilante encampment west of De Witt. Dr. William W. Austin, who had commanded the Carroll County regulators in August as well as the multi-county forces during the Daviess County operation in September, was desirous that someone else take command, therefore, in order to give more “legal” sanction to their activities an election was held. Congreave Jackson of Howard County was chosen brigadier, Ebenezer Price of Clay County, colonel; Singleton Vaughn of Saline, lieutenant colonel; and Sashel Woods of Carroll, major.71 With the arrival of reinforcements, the vigilante force made plans for a second strike on the community on October 4. On this date, anti-Mormon forces made [168] a sustained attacked on the community. Shots were fired on both sides, but the regulators were repulsed by the Mormon defenders. One Missourian from Saline was reported to have been wounded in the hip.72

The regulators received support from many of the local citizens. Mr. Cross, the landowner who had volunteered his property for the vigilante encampment, turned over thirty acres of corn and provided beef to the camp each day. Roland Adkins, another citizen who owned the only horse mill east of Carrollton, supplied the camp with meal and flour.73 The De Witt Saints were not as fortunate. The majority of their farm and stock property was located outside the main town, which they were eventually forced to abandon in order to find safety and security within the community’s defenses. Since the Mormons were also pinned in De Witt and surrounded by anti-Mormon forces, they had few other options than to sustain themselves using their own supplies and foodstuffs. Eventually, however, the shortage of essentials created a constant need of food and provisions. The mob kept them “shut up in the town, not allowing them to go out to get provisions,” Sidney Rigdon reported, “driving off their cattle, and preventing the owners from going in search of them. In this way the citizens were driven to the greatest extremities, actually suffering for food and every comfort of life.”74 Fortunately for the Latter-day Saints, stray cattle [169] and hogs would occasionally wander into the Mormon quarters. These animals would immediately be killed and butchered and provided a limited supply of food and sustenance for the beleaguered community.75

General Parks, accompanied by the two companies of Ray militia, arrived in Carroll County on October 6 and camped five miles from De Witt. The following day, the commander addressed a letter to Atchison wherein he reported the current state of affairs. In assessing the situation, Parks perceived that the Mormons had acted on the defensive and were determined to hold out. On the other hand, he expected the vigilante force would not only increase in size, but they would not leave the Mormons alone until they were out of the county. Thus he believed the standoff was bound to continue unless more necessary measures were taken.76

Recognizing the need for additional men, the Ray County general gave orders to William Claude Jones, commander of Carroll’s militia (and a leading vigilante member), to raise three companies of county militia and to hold themselves in readiness if the situation escalated. However, Parks soon realized it would be virtually impossible to organize the three units from among the county’s volunteers since the majority of Carroll’s men were members of the anti-Mormon forces. In order to obtain the necessary manpower, he sent instructions to Doniphan, requesting that he engage five companies from Clay, Platte, and Clinton. Until the necessary troops arrived, he believed that his only course was to negotiate in behalf of the two parties. He also issued a request to General Atchison that he use his influence to persuade the governor to go [170] to De Witt. “It would relieve me much if you would request the governor to make his appearance here among the Carroll boys; he need not order out any forces, those already ordered by me I deem sufficient. You know a word from his Excellency would have more power to quell this affair than a regiment.”77 The letter to the governor was first forwarded to Atchison (in Boonville), who attached his own message also requesting the governor proceed to the scene of the difficulty. “I have no doubt but your Excellency, if you should deem it your duty to proceed to Carroll county, [you] could restore peace,” he wrote.78 The division general also offered to accompany the state’s chief executive to De Witt. But the requests made by the two officers fell on deaf ears.

Meanwhile, both sides continued to implement additional military measures. By October 6, the county regulators had obtained a cannon from some citizens of Jackson County. The gun, reported to be a “six-pounder,” cost Carrollton residents ten dollars per day.79 Hiram Wilcoxson, who had been sent to procure the cannon, also secured the services of an old Scotchman living in Ray County who had several years of artillery experience in the British army. “The arrival of the cannon was hailed with great satisfaction,” wrote A. C. Blackwell, “as it was thought to be destined to play an important part in the settlement of the difficulties.”80 At the anti-Mormon encampment, the weapon was mounted on the back of a carriage and a few men were selected to [171] be trained in its use. The siege ended before the gun was put to use, but it continued to play a part in the Mormon-Missouri contest. After the problems in De Witt were resolved, when the conflict shifted once again back to Daviess County, the possession of the cannon by mob forces generated additional Mormon military activity in an attempt to secure it.

In late September, Joseph Smith learned about the escalating conflict and the oppressive conditions Church members were laboring under in De Witt and took steps to provide relief and reinforcements to the beleaguered community.81 Two companies were subsequently organized—one headed by the Mormon Prophet himself, and the other by Seymour Brunson. Brunson’s company, consisting of forty-two mounted men, left Far West on the morning of Friday, October 5. The Prophet’s company, which numbered in the vicinity of twenty, left later that afternoon and arrived the following day.82 Even though the roads leading to the community were patrolled and well-[172]guarded, both groups were able to pass without major incident.83 With the arrival of the Caldwell troops, the total number of Mormon defenders was approximately 130.84

Significantly, during the entire De Witt conflict, the county regulators either perceived that they were outnumbered by the Latter-day Saints, or they purposely and intentionally exaggerated the figures in order to induce additional recruits to join their ranks. For example, following the arrival of Mormon reinforcements from Far West, Adam C. Woods, a citizen of Howard County wrote, “I was informed, and believe the information to be true, that the Mormons at De Witt are between five and six hundred, well armed.” He stated that he was so fearful the Mormons were superior in terms of numbers, that he was sure to be injured if fighting broke out, so he chose not to fight but remained at the main encampment.85 In addition to Woods, several other volunteers from Howard County addressed a letter to their fellow citizens in their own and adjoining counties requesting immediate assistance and more men. “The infatuated Mormons have assembled in large numbers in De Witt,” the letter reads, “and are continually pouring in from all quarters. . . . Come by fives and tens, if you cannot come by companies; bring all you can.”86 [173]

 

Negotiations and Surrender

During the siege, six representatives from Chariton and Howard Counties—John W. Price, William K. Logan, Judge James Earickson, William F. Dunnica, William D. Sweeney, and a Major Flory—went to investigate the difficulties, offering their services to act as mediators between the two parties.87 Significantly, it was through the influence of these men, particularly Earickson, and not the civil or military officials, that eventually an agreement was reached between the two warring factions. On October 4, Price and Logan, Chariton’s representatives, were the first to meet with leaders from both camps. Upon conversing with the vigilante commanders at the Pleasant Park encampment, they reported that a hostile temperament prevailed. The leaders informed the two representatives that they were “waging a war of extermination, or to remove [the Mormons] from the . . . county.” Upon meeting with officials in the Mormon community Price and 
Logan stated that a very different attitude was exhibited. “We found them in the act of defence, begging for peace,” they wrote, “and wishing for civil authorities to repair there as early as possible, to settle the difficulties.”88

On October 6, the Howard delegation, led by Judge Earickson and Dunnica, met with leaders from both sides. After considerable discussion, anti-Mormon leaders agreed to allow the Howard representatives to make the following proposal to the LDS leaders. First, if the Mormons would leave the county and not return again, they would be reimbursed the cost of their property [174] plus ten percent, as well as the expense they incurred to move both in and out of the county; second, the Latter-day Saints must pay for the animals they killed; and third, they must leave by ten a.m. the following day. Negotiations came to a standstill when the Mormons rejected the proposal, stating they were determined to defend themselves and would be driven no more.89

Refusal by the Mormons to surrender to the demands made by vigilante leaders centered in their hope that Parks and his two militia companies would put down the community regulators, just as Atchison’s troops had done in Daviess County in September. However, the Ray general informed the Mormons that the greater part of his men, including one of his senior officers, Captain Samuel Bogart, had “mutinied and were mobocratic.” Furthermore, because his troops could not be depended upon to enforce the law or defend the Mormons, he proposed withdrawing his two companies for fear they would join the mob.90 This fact was well known, even among the county’s local citizens. Edward Lampkin, a Carrollton resident and non-Mormon wrote, “the militia have been called out to suppress the mob, but I believe they intend helping to kill them, they have [even] taken a few shots.”91 There is evidence indicating that Parks himself was at best indifferent to the Mormon cause and in fact disliked them. Edward Stevenson noted, “although a General in government service, [Parks] was a mobber in spirit and did not protect the Mormons.”92 [175]

On October 9, A. L. Caldwell returned to De Witt to report to LDS leaders concerning his meeting with the governor in Jefferson City. His news was not encouraging. Boggs was unsympathetic to the Mormon cause and refused to intervene. Caldwell returned with the message that “‘the quarrel was between the Mormons and the mob’ and that ‘we might fight it out.’”93 The governor was not necessarily sanctioning warfare. He simply knew that the vast majority of Missourians in Carroll County and the surrounding region were so against Mormon occupation that it would only be a matter of time before the Latter-day Saints would be forced to concede to the demands of the populace and abandon their community.

Following nine days of skirmishes, surprise strikes, at least two major assaults, and two attempts at negotiation, vigilante leaders determined that the Mormons had been given ample opportunity to capitulate and began making plans for an all-out attack on the community. The strategy called for Singleton Vaughn to converge from the east, Colonel Price from the west, and Congreave Jackson, with the cannon, would charge the center. Fortunately for the Latter-day Saints, Judge Earickson informed them of the planned incursion just before the forces were ready to advance. Recognizing the seriousness of the situation, the Mormons agreed to back down and sent Earickson to inform vigilante leaders they would agree to terms.94 [176]

Upon receiving word of the Mormon surrender on October 10, a peace commission consisting of six representatives was chosen—William W. Austin, Abott Hancock, and A. C. Blackwell representing Carrollton; and Singleton Vaughn, David Walker, and Benjamin Cooper in behalf of Saline. James Earickson, William Dunnica, and William Sweeney, three members of the delegation who had come from Howard to investigate the disturbances, were selected to represent the Mormons. When the commissioners entered the town, Colonel Hinkle “received his visitors in a friendly manner.” The leaders observed that the families were already in the process of packing and loading their belongings in preparation for the expected evacuation. They also noted the people were in distressful circumstances. In fact, it was reported that when Austin and Hancock, two of the most hostile vigilante leaders, saw the deplorable conditions of the women and children, they were brought to tears.95 A brief meeting was held among the leaders of the two sides. The Mormons were told they had twelve hours to evacuate the town.96 Hinkle also delivered up his sword as a symbolic demonstration acknowledging their surrender.97 The Mormon colonel then proposed that a final settlement meeting be held in the community of Glasgow at a later date after both sides had determined their costs and losses.98 [177]

The De Witt Saints were forced to capitulate for several reasons. First, they were outnumbered. As the conflict progressed, it became increasingly difficult for the Mormons to defend De Witt. Whereas the vigilantes received a steady number of volunteers from the surrounding counties, who were all willing to take up arms against the Latter-day Saints, the only additional support the De Witt Saints could obtain were the sixty reinforcements from Caldwell and Daviess—a number far from sufficient. It is no wonder Joseph Smith wrote, “We had . . . no hopes whatever, of successfully resisting the mob, who kept constantly increasing.”99

Second, the community’s food supplies were entirely exhausted. “There was neither bread nor flour to be had in the place,” wrote Sidney Rigdon. He further surmised that the situation was so acute that the Saints had no other alternative but to either vacate the community or starve.100 Many of the Saints were also sick due to the adverse conditions, lack of shelter (many were living in wagons), and no medical aid. Silent death was literally staring them in the face.101

A third factor was the governor’s unwillingness to help the Saints. “[When] we recievd [sic] word . . . that the Gov. would do nothing for us & as we could get no protection from the authorities of the State we were forced to surrender,” wrote John Murdock.102 Boggs simply [178] refused to take any action—even after the Mormons made two attempts to secure his assistance, in addition to Parks’ and Atchison’s requests that he go to Carroll to help mediate and reconcile the situation. Instead, he was content to let the military officers in the district handle the problem.103

Fourth, the militia failed to resolve the conflict. Unfortunately for the De Witt Saints, Atchison, the highest ranking officer, was called away on military business and could not oversee the operation, leaving brigadier generals Doniphan and Parks ultimately in charge. When Judge King called out the militia, he chose Parks. Parks went to the scene but did not quell the vigilantes or negotiate a settlement. Doniphan was also subsequently summoned, but the Mormons capitulated before he could get Carroll. Had either Atchison or Doniphan overseen the operation, the outcome may have been more favorable for the Mormons. Perhaps they would have even been allowed to remain on their lands, just like in Daviess County, but it is likely more fighting would have ensued later.

 

Exodus

On October 11 the Saints evacuated the city.104 A. C. Blackwell observed the event: “The Mormons . . . filed out of town, men, women and children casting a sorrowful look behind them as they left forever the spot on which they had hoped to build a prosperous and thriving city.”105 [179] The company of men who had come from Far West rode at the head and rear of the procession as a guard.106 However, even as they were en route out of the county shots were fired at them.107 Some of the leading perpetrators were men who had made up part of Parks militia who had declared they would not let the Mormons pass to Far West.108

The seventy mile journey to Caldwell County was not an easy one. Zadok Judd, although just a boy, remembered the trip. The company traveled twelve miles the first day and camped in a grove of trees. During the night an elderly woman by the name of Downey died. “She had travelled with us all the way from Canada,” he wrote. “She was old and feeble and so much rough usage was more than she could endure. She was buried [the next day] without much ceremony—without any coffin—wrapped in a quilt and put in the grave.”109 Zadok was also given the responsibility of herding three cows, but being barefoot, the weather being cold, and the ground hard from the frost, this proved to be quite an ordeal. While en route, several men came [180] from Far West to assist the travelers. One of the men told Zadok he would drive the cows and he could ride with him on his horse. “To this day my heart swells with gratitude for his kindness. I never knew his name and perhaps never shall. I believe that was the most uncomfortable [journey] I remember,” he wrote.110 Most of the company arrived in Far West on October 14.111

The status of Mormonism in northern Missouri changed dramatically following the De Witt episode, and for the first time since the 1836 Clay County removal, the movement was on the retreat. In fact, it took several steps backwards. The conflict and subsequent removal clearly manifested that expansion would not be tolerated, but even more significantly, Church members who were living outside the confines of Caldwell faced the threat of expulsion. In addition, the events associated with the confrontation confirmed in the minds of the Mormons that the elected officials, particularly Governor Boggs, were biased against them and would not assist them. Furthermore, the actions of the militia and its officers demonstrated that in spite of their responsibility to maintain civil order, they could also oppose the Latter-day Saint cause, even to the point of uniting with the anti-Mormon element. Although there were those individuals who were sympathetic and fair-minded in their attitudes, they were a small minority and generated only a minimal degree of influence or restraint. After De Witt, the Mormons essentially stood alone, which meant in their minds that if their rights and peace were to be secured, it would have to be done by themselves. [181]


Notes

1. In discussing the Mormon conflict in Carroll County it is important to note that in 1876, James Trotter prepared what is known to be the first published history of the region. (See Trotter, “History of Carroll County, Missouri,” in An Illustrated Historical Atlas of Carroll County, Missouri [N.p.: Brink, McDonough, & Co., 1876]). In his narrative, Trotter included a detailed historical reminiscence of the Mormon problems written by A. C. Blackwell, a member of the Carrollton County militia and the committee who oversaw the negotiations associated with the Mormon expulsion from De Witt. It appears Trotter specifically requested Blackwell write the history so he could include it in his text. Thereafter, Blackwell’s detailed reminiscence of the Mormon conflict in Carroll County forms the basis, or was the actual text, used by local and state historians in their histories about the Latter-day Saints in the county. (See History of Carroll County, Missouri, Carefully Written and Compiled from the Most Authentic Official and Private Sources, Including a History of its Townships, Cities, Towns and Villages, Together With a Condensed History of Missouri; the Condition of the United States, and State of Missouri; a Military Record of its Volunteers in Either Army of the Great Civil War; General and Local Statistics; Miscellany; Reminiscences, Grave, Tragic and Humorous; Biographical Sketches of Prominent Men and Citizens Identified With the Interests of the County [St. Louis: Missouri Historical Company, 1881], 247–62; W. F. Switzler, Switzler’s Illustrated History of Missouri From 1541 to 1877, 244–47; S. K. Turner and S. A. Clark, Twentieth Century History of Carroll County Missouri [Indianapolis: B. F. Bowen & Company, 1911] 204–13; Susan H. Whiteman, “Mormon Troubles in Carroll County,” Missouri Historical Review 8 [July 1914]:220–22; and “The Mormon War,” De Witt History, 1836–1986 [De Witt, Missouri: De Witt Town and Country Betterment Club, 1986], 12–13.)

Since Blackwell wrote his historical reminiscence nearly forty years after the De Witt episode and was relying mostly on memory, he occasionally erred in his reporting, particularly regarding specific dates of the events associated with the expulsion. In Leland H. Gentry and Keith W. Perkins’ separate discussions on De Witt, the two writers apparently assumed Blackwell’s dates were accurate and accepted them as such, even though many are clearly incorrect. Because of their failure to recognize and identify Blackwell’s dating errors, both authors discussed and placed several of the events associated with the Mormon expulsion in an incorrect time frame and sequence and are therefore inaccurate. (See Gentry, “History of the Latter-day Saints in Northern Missouri From 1836–1839,” 194–212; and Keith W. Perkins, “De Witt—Prelude to Expulsion,” Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint Church History: Missouri, 261–280.)

2. David Thomas to Joseph Smith, Jr., 31 March 1838, in Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 2:225–26. In the letter, Thomas also proposed selling to the Mormons a section of land in Monroe County, near the confluence of the North Fork of the Salt and the Salt Rivers in the eastern portion of the state. See also Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 36.

3. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:450. See also Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 36..

4. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:450–51.

5. Murdock, “Journal,” 18.

6. The figure for the number of De Witt town lots purchased from Root was obtained from the map printed in Perkins, “De Witt—Prelude to Expulsion,” 266. See also Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:450–51; and Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 365–37. Following the Mormon expulsion from the state, Root relocated with the majority of Latter-day Saints in Quincy, Illinois where he wrote a petition in behalf of the Saints. (See Root petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 332; also in HC 4:62–63.) Local histories state he remained in Quincy where he became a banker. (Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Shortly after the Missouri period he apparently discontinued his association with the Latter-day Saints.

7. Michael S. Riggs has put forth another possible explanation for the Mormon War focusing on the De Witt community. Riggs contends Ft. Leavenworth actually provided the greatest market for Mormon products and argued that transporting goods via the water was more economical than overland. By shipping their goods through De Witt, the Mormons would bypass the landing at Liberty thereby eliminating the fees levied there. (See Riggs, “The Economic Impact of Fort Leavenworth on Northwestern Missouri 1827–1838: Yet Another Reason for the Mormon War,” Restoration Studies 5 [1988]: 124–133.)

8. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Mormon historian Andrew Jenson suggested the purchase was made in order to provide a place of settlement for a number of Canadian converts who were planning to emigrate to Missouri. He wrote, “As quite a number of Saints were expected from Canada that season, it was decided by the authorities of the Church that they, upon their arrival in Missouri, should locate at De Witt, if the place suited them.” (Jenson, “De Witt,” The Historical Record 7 [July 1888]: 603.)

9. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.

10. The minutes of a high council meeting on July 6 show that Hinkle had already moved to De Witt and wanted to sell his home in Far West to Edward Partridge. (See Cannon and Cook, Far West Record, 197.) Charles H. Hales is the source indicating Hinkle was made the branch president. (See Charles H. Hales, “Autobiography” in Windows: A Mormon Family, 34.) Citing the Albert Perry Rockwood Journal, Keith W. Perkins incorrectly stated a stake was made at De Witt. Rockwood however, specifically indicated no such stake was ever made. (See Perkins, “De Witt: Prelude to Expulsion, 265; and Rockwood, “Journal,” 21.)

11. Walter Williams, ed. A History of Northwest Missouri (Chicago and New York: Lewis Publishing Company, 1915), 399.

12. Blackwell gave the date of the first meeting as taking place on July 14. (See Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) However, the actual date of the meeting as given in press reports indicates it was held on July 30. (Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838.) His narrative indicates three public meetings were held in July and August to discuss plans concerning the Mormons (July 14, 21, and August 11), whereas the reports published in the Missouri Republican under the dates of August 18 and 25, specifically state there were only two meetings (July 30 and August 7). Both Gentry and Perkins failed to cite the published report as given in the Missouri Republican, relying exclusively on Blackwell’s reminiscence and therefore incorrectly date when the meetings were held and the sequence of events. (See Gentry, “A History of the Latter-day Saints in Northern Missouri From 1836–1839,” 194–96; and Perkins, “De Witt: Prelude to Expulsion,” 265.) LeSueur makes no mention of either the Mormon or anti-Mormon activities in De Witt in July or August.

13. Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838.

14. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

15. Murdock, “Journal,” 18. As noted, the press report stated Abott Hancock, Samuel Williams, and John Smart were the Carrollton representatives. Murdock indicated Hancock, Smart, and Sashiel Woods were the men who were sent. Hancock and Woods were ministers.

16. Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838. The record indicates the committee only met with Root. David Thomas was absent from the meeting.

17. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

18. Ibid; and Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838. Upon being informed by the Carrollton committee concerning the Mormon problem, the citizens of Saline and Howard counties met on August 21 and 30 respectively, and adopted a “wait-and-see” attitude—indicating they would be ready and willing to give aid if the situation escalated. (See Missouri Republican, 6 September 1838).

Stephen LeSueur has argued that the actions of the Carroll majority should not be considered as being entirely lawless in terms of nineteenth century standards governing American republicanism. Concerning the procedure by which the local citizens attempted to expel the Mormons, he has concluded: “The settlers in Carroll and the surrounding counties . . . did not simply gather in mobs to expel the Saints. Instead, they called public meetings (at which the leading citizens participated), debated what action to take, elected officers, established committees of vigilance, . . . published the proceedings of their meetings . . . . held a public vote to decide whether to allow the Mormons to remain . . . . and sent representatives to the Mormons to request that they leave their counties. Their procedures followed common patterns of vigilantism in the Unites States during this period. They acted in an orderly, rational manner to preserve their culture and values. The Mormons of course, condemned these proceedings as unlawful and ‘mobocratic.’ Yet the participants considered their actions to be a proper response to the Mormon problem. Their willingness to give the Mormons official notice of their resolutions created an impression of forbearance, making it appear as if the Mormons, by refusing to leave, were bringing the violence upon themselves. Moreover, their restrained and orderly procedures seemed to legitimize their actions, allowing them to operates as if their extra-legal organizations carried the same force as their official county governments.” (Stephen C. LeSueur, “A Scarter [sic] Man Than One of Them Was I Never Saw: Attitudes and Perceptions of Missourians During the 1838 Mormon War,” Mormon Miscellaneous Papers, No. 1, May 1986, 6–7.)

19. I. H. Arnold to Isaac Arnold, 12 August 1838, typescript, RLDS Archives, Independence, Missouri, 2–3.

20. Arthur Bradford to Thomas Bradford, 13 August 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 114.

21. Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470. William Claude Jones was the commander of the Carroll County militia. (See Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.)

22. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503; also Murdock, “Journal,” 18; and John Taylor, A Short Account of the Murders, Roberies [sic], Burnings, Thefts, and Other Outrages Committed by the Mob and Militia of the State of Missouri Upon the Latter Day Saints. The Persecutions They Have Endured for Their Religion, and Their Banishment From that State by the Authorities There, by John Taylor, Elder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Commerce, Illinois: 1839), 2–3.

23. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.

24. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

25. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503. In his journal, Murdock specifically recorded that on August 20, “a mob of more than a hundred men came, and ordered us off.” (Murdock, “Journal,” 18.) John Thorp later recalled this incident: “A mob arose . . . headed by Sashael Wood a presbyterian Preacher and marched into the Town of Dewett [sic] and fired their guns and frighten[e]d the women this Town belong[e]d to us and they notified us to leave there in ten days. after ten days they came and fired on us.” (Thorp petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 548.)

26. John Taylor, A Short Account, 3. Smith Humphrey testified he “Saw the Sheriff of said Co. take G. M. Hinkel [sic] a prisoner & carry him out of town [but] the said Hinkel returned the same evening.” (Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470.)

27. Murdock, “Journal,” 18.

28. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

29. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.

30. B. H. Roberts, The Life of John Taylor, Third President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1963), 56–57. Taylor did not participate in any action while in De Witt. His stay there was only a few days when he continued on to Far West. He also indicated the Missourians captured a “stray Saint” (Ibid, 57), with possible reference to either Smith Humphrey or Pierce Hawley’s detention.

In his narrative, A Short Account, Taylor indicated that the intrusion of De Witt by Jones and Woods, including Hinkle’s arrest, took place in late September. (Taylor, A Short Account, 2–3.) However, John Murdock specifically stated it occurred on August 20. (Murdock, “Journal,” 18.) In his petition, Murdock also notes it as taking place about that same time. (Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.) Smith Humphrey’s petition also supports the August date. (Ibid, 470.)

31. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Blackwell stated the campsite was known as Pleasant Park. (Ibid.) John Murdock is the source indicating the encampment was about a mile west of De Witt. He also stated it was an old camp meeting ground. (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)

32. Root petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 332. Root specifically stated the group under Austin were acting “under no regular authority.”

33. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. In his history, A. C. Blackwell stated the Carroll and Saline troops returned from Daviess on September 9, the Mormons were then given ten days to evacuate (this would have been from September 10–19), with the final assault beginning on September 20 and lasting until around October 1. This is incorrect. All other sources support the following time line: The Carrollton (and Saline) companies returned from Daviess on September 19 or 20; the Mormons then were given the ten-day grace period, September 20–30; and the final siege on the Mormon community and actual fighting began on October 1. As noted, the multi-county vigilante forces did not leave Daviess until after Atchison ordered them to do so following the court of inquiry held on September 18–19. (Ibid; and David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 20 September 1838, in Document, 27; also in HC 3:81–82; and Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 38.)

34. Citizens of Carroll to Mrs. Smith, 10 September 1838, in Journal History, 10 September 1838. Mrs. Smith is likely Elizabeth Smith, whose name appears on the 22 September 1838 petition to Governor Boggs, and is the only female name on the petition, indicating she was the head of the household because of the death of her husband. (See Document, 29–30.) A few of the circumstances surrounding the death of her husband are referred to in a postscript included in the letter and also contains an additional warning. “The circumstances under which you became defenseless and your children orphans endear the memory of your husband to our hearts, and his heroic efforts to rescue his suffering and dying fellow-mortals from the jaws of death, have immortalized his name and place his wife and children under our protection. Do not, therefore, disregard our counsel, we conjure you, but leave that ill-fated place as we are determined to remove all Mormons and their aids and abettors from the county.” (Ibid.)

35. Emos McNell petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 494. After leaving Missouri, McNell subsequently relocated in Hancock County, Illinois, where he became a member of the Church and was an active participant during the Nauvoo period. He is listed as Enos McNoll in Susan Easton Black, comp., Membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1848 (Provo: Religious Studies Center and the Department of Church History and Doctrine, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 1989), 30:437.

36. Thomas Hollinshead petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 237. It is assumed Hollinshead was a non-member at the time he was living in De Witt based upon the fact that the treatment both he and McNell received was similar and there is no record of his membership. However, his petition indicated he did in fact at some time join the Church. Following the De Witt expulsion he stated he was also forced to leave the state “with the others professing the Same religion as my Self. (Ibid.) Hollinshead is cited as being a member in Black, Membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, 23:574.

37. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

38. John Murdock wrote, “George M. Hinkle took the command of our men. I of ten men. H. S. Sherwood of ten, Brother Surley [probably Albert Soree] ten.” (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)

39. Petition of the De Witt Mormons to Lilburn W. Boggs, Document, 29–30; also HC 3:82–83. David Thomas is the only individual on the list who is specifically listed as a non-Mormon. However, as noted Elizabeth Smith was likely not a member, as was A. L. Caldwell.

40. HC 3:85. On September 21, the Canadian company was reported to have been in Randolph County, approximately 30–40 miles to the east. On that date an unnamed individual reported, “Thirty wagons left my house this morning for Far West, all Canadians and Mormons to join Jo Smith & Co.” (Missouri Republican, 29 September 1838.) Considering the remaining distance the company had to travel, their arrival at De Witt probably occurred around September 23–25. In a reminiscent history, Page incorrectly indicated his party arrived at the De Witt landing during the first week of October. (See Page, “History of John E. Page,” Millennial Star 27 [18 February 1865]: 103.) Page’s company was not the first or only group of Canadians to arrive at De Witt, but it was probably the largest. As noted previously, John Taylor, also a citizen of Canada, arrived in late August. Stephen Markham, though not from Canada, also arrived at De Witt about the end of September. Warren Foote stated Markham had intentions of going on to Far West but was detained by the mob at De Witt. (See Foote, Autobiography,” 25.)

41. Hales, “Autobiography,” 34.

42. Zadok Knapp Judd, “Autobiography of Zadoc Knapp Judd,” typescript, Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University Library, Provo, Utah, 7–8. The name of Arza Judd, Zadoc’s father, was not on the September 22 petition sent to Boggs, indicating his family was likely part of the Canadian company that arrived the last week of September.

43. Christopher Merkley, Biography of Christopher Merkley, Written by Himself (Salt Lake City: J. H. Parry & Company, 1887), 4. Zadok Judd expressed how difficult it was for some to take up arms in defense of the community. “This state of affairs was very trying to some of our sober, serious Christians that had been taught that it was wicked to fight; it almost rocked their faith in the gospel; to take up arms and try to kill their fellow mortals was a new doctrine that some could hardly endure and it was reported some feigned sickness and stayed in their wagons.” (Judd, “Autobiography,” 8–9.)

44. This figure can be substantiated from a number of sources including: HC 3:159; Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 1:215; and Daniel Avery, William Hawk, Joseph Smith, and Sidney Rigdon petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 128, 226, 347, and 666; also in HC 3:451; 4:58, 60–61. In addition, the September 22 petition contained the names of 50 individuals (all of whom were males, with the exception of one) who were likely heads of households. That figure, combined with the 30 Canadian families who arrived at the end of September brings the figure to 80. Thus, the calculation 70–80.

LeSueur wrote the arrival of the Canadian Saints in late September “finally provoked the attack on the Mormon town.” (LeSueur, The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 102.) This however is incorrect, since the Missourians made it clear to the Mormons on September 20 that they would attack the community following the ten-day grace period.

45. Smith, “My Journal,” p. 64.

46. Don Carlos Smith, “A Journal Kept by Don C. Smith, While on a Mission with George A. Smith, His Cousin,” in Lucy Mack Smith, Biographical Sketches of Joseph Smith, the Prophet, and His Progenitors for Many Generations (Liverpool: Published for Orson Pratt by S. W. Richards, 1853), 284.

47. Smith, “My Journal,” 65. The trial was apparently held at Boonville since the letters sent by Atchison up until the date of October 16, were addressed from Boonville. Lucas’ October 4 letter to Governor Boggs was also sent from Boonville. (See Document, 34–35.)

48. Smith, “My Journal,” 65. Both George A. Smith and Don Carlos reported that after embarking from De Witt, Moses Wilson boasted of the deeds he committed against the Mormons in Jackson County. (See Ibid, and D. C. Smith, “Journal,” 284–85.)

49. Samuel Lucas to Lilburn W. Boggs, 4 October 1838, in Document, 34–35; also in HC 3:150.

50. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. During the month of October, Nathan Knight was passing through Carroll when was accosted twice by men who were patrolling the county roads. After being held for four days, he escaped and was able to make it back to Far West by riding over the open prairie. (Knight petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 476.)

51. Murdock, “Journal,” 20.

52. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

53. Edward Lampkin to Thomas Bradford, 23 September 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor, Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 115.

54. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 503.

55. Rockwood, “Journal,” 21.

56. Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470. In a second petition, Humphrey wrote another account of the house burning. (See Ibid, 241.) Other Latter-day Saints made mention of Humphrey’s ordeal in their recollections of the Missouri persecutions. (See William Hawk petition in Ibid, 228; also in HC 4:58; Parley P. Pratt petition, Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 640; also HC 3:425; Pratt, History of the Late Persecution, 29; also in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 75; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 39; and Edward Stevenson, “The Life and History of Elder Edward Stevenson,” manuscript (copy), Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 90.)

A brief narrative of Humphrey’s home burning appears in the HC under the date of October 9 (see HC 3:157), but as noted Humphrey stated it took place around October 1. Humphrey also stated that a man by the name of Hiram Standley directed the attack on his home. In the published report of Carrollton’s July and August public meetings, a James Standley is mentioned. (Missouri Republican, 18 August 1838). Blackwell gives the names of a James and John Standley as being leading anti-Mormon participants, but no Hiram. (Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Humphrey possibly confused one of the two Standleys with Hiram Wilcoxson, another Carrollton vigilante.

57. Brown petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 426.

58. The HC under the date of October 2 states: “The mob pressed harder upon De Witt and fired upon the Saints.” (HC 3:85.)

59. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Henry Root filed an affidavit on October 3, stating the anti- Mormon forces made their initial attack on De Witt the day before. (See Henry Root to David R. Atchison, 3 October 1838, in Document, 35.)

60. Murdock, “Journal,” 20.

61. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. John Murdock believed the vigilante forces retreated because they believed the Mormons outnumbered them. “About 30 of their men . . . ran in the woods to the other end of their line and came in contact with 10 of our men, under Captain Surley, who were in ambush, behind a big log . . . and they ran back swearing the Mormons were surrounding them, jumping over into the cornfield, and this scared the rest and they followed suit, and away went the whole 150, that were able to run from 30.” (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)

62. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. George W. G. Averett, a Latter-day Saint, was familiar with the incident and added a few details. “One of the mobbers . . . approaching the night guard . . . while on duty and firing their guns at him without affect and breaking [in]to [a] run . . . [the guard] fired his gun at one of them striking him near the mouth, and to use the language of [the Mormon guard] he made the mobber call on his God he thought for the first time in his whole lifetime, and it was stated that [the guard] shot his chew of tobacco out of his mouth.” (George W. G. Averett, “Biographical Sketch of George Washington Gill Averett,” typescript, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 5). Averett identified the Mormon guard as a man by the name of Williams when in fact Williams was the Missourian who was shot at.

63. Henry Root to David R. Atchison, 3 October 1838, in Document, 35; also in HC 3:149. The letter is actually an affidavit, filed in Richmond but addressed to Atchison. The document is important since it indicated the vigilante forces converged upon De Witt on the evening of October 1, then attacked on the morning of the October 2.

64. John Murdock stated, “about the 2nd or 3rd of Oct . . . we Sent Henry Root to Judg[e] King.” (Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504; see also Murdock, “Journal,” 20.) Joseph Smith indicated, “Judge King was also petitioned to afford us some assistance: He sent a company of about 100 men.” (Smith petition, in Mormon Redress Petitions, 347.) John Taylor wrote that Root was sent to meet with King, but incorrectly gave the date of his departure as being October 6. (See Taylor, A Short Account, 3.)

65. David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 5 October 1838, in Document, 35. The correspondence between Parks and Atchison is included in Henry Root’s 3 October 1838 letter-affidavit to Atchison. (See Ibid, 35–36; also HC 3:149–150.)

66. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504. Murdock indicated Caldwell left around October 2–3. (See also Rigdon petition in Ibid, 667; also in HC 3:451; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 39; and Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 1:214.) The date of Caldwell’s dispatch is cited in the HC under the date of October 6, and after Joseph Smith’s arrival in the community, but this date would be incorrect since he left several days earlier. The man was likely A. L. Caldwell whose name appears on the September 22 petition to the governor. Jessee and LeSueur incorrectly identify him as A. C. Caldwell. (See Jessee, Ibid, 1:214 note; and LeSueur, The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 105.)

67. Lilburn W. Boggs to the Missouri State House of Representatives, 5 December 1838, in Document, 14. In an October 9 letter to the governor, Atchison made mention of the fact that Boggs had been in St. Louis. (David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 9 October 1838, in Ibid, 38; see also Corrill, A Brief History, 35–36.)

68. Murdock, “Journal,” 20.

69. Humphrey petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 470.

70. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

71. Ibid. Blackwell estimated between four and five hundred men had assembled to go against the Mormons, whereas most other sources indicate around three hundred. (See Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, in Document, 37.) Parks indicated Austin was still commanding the anti-Mormon forces.

72. William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838; and Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, in Document, 37. Only two Missourians sustained injuries in the De Witt conflict—Gentry, the man accidentally wounded by one of his comrades in the nighttime raid, and the man from Saline. (See Arthur I. H. Bradford to Thomas Bradford, 14 October 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 115.)

73. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Of the three hundred men, approximately half were citizens of Carroll and half from other counties.

74. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:451. See also John Thorp petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 548. Christopher Merkley, a Canadian emigrant, lost a mare during the siege and made an attempt to leave the community in order to find the animal. He was accosted by a heavily armed band who made several threats against his life. They also interrogated him, asking several times how many men were defending De Witt. He was eventually released unharmed. (See Merkley, Biography of Christopher Merkley, 4–6.)

75. See Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666–68; also in HC 3:451–52. Rigdon further stated that because the Mormons killed the strays that came into the community, they were accused of stealing and plundering.

76. Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, Document, 37; also in HC 3:155–56.

77. Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, Document, 37–38; also in HC 3:155–56.

78. David R. Atchison to Lilburn W. Boggs, 9 October 1838, in Document, 38.

79. Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 38; Amasa Mason Lyman, “Amasa Lyman’s History,” Millennial Star 27 (19 August 1865): 20. Exactly when Wilcoxson returned to Carrollton with the cannon is not known. However, William F. Dunnica, the Howard representative, writing from Carroll County on October 7, and Hiram Parks, writing to Atchison on the same day both stated the weapon was in the possession of the vigilantes. (See William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838; and Hiram G. Parks to David R. Atchison, 7 October 1838, in Document, 37.)

80. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

81. According to the Prophet’s history, while he was engaged in locating a site for a new settlement in southern Caldwell County, his company was met by a messenger came from De Witt who informed him about the difficulties the Saints were operating under in the settlement. (See Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 1:213; and Joseph Smith petition, in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 346–47.)

82. Rockwood, “Journal,” 21; see also HC 3:152–53; and Hales, “Autobiography,” 34. James Mulholland, a clerk employed to keep the Prophet’s history, recorded under the date of October 5: “Saw him early in the morning say 7 o[’]clock, again about 10 o[’]clock, did not see him all the afternoon, understood that he went from home.” (Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 2:307.) It apparently took a few days to make preparations to leave which explains the October 5 departure date. (See Ibid, 1:213; and Joseph Smith petition, in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 346–47.) In his history of the De Witt conflict, A. C. Blackwell indicated Lyman Wight was the leading member of the relief party. Furthermore, he made no mention of Joseph Smith. (See Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Joseph Thorp, an early resident of the Grand River region, also speaks of Wight’s presence. (See Thorp, Early Days In the West Along the Missouri One Hundred Years Ago [Liberty, Missouri: Irving Gilmer Publisher, 1924], 85; first published as part of a continuing series, “Early Days in Missouri,” in the Liberty Tribune, 2 November 1883. Thorp mistakenly refers to Wight as Wright.) Perkins maintains this was an error and contends the writer must have confused Joseph Smith with being Lyman Wight. (See Perkins, “De Witt: Prelude to Expulsion,” 297, note #50.) I maintain that because Wight held a military commission, and because of his military expertise, he went to De Witt in order to lend assistance.

83. Rockwood, “Journal,” 21. Rockwood indicated that when Brunson’s company approached the community they were hailed by the mob but passed on and arrived in safety. (Ibid.) Concerning Joseph Smith’s group Reed Peck wrote, “The presidency with a large company of volunteers hastened to Dewitt and were permitted to enter the town without opposition though they passed in view of the mob. . . . The mob knew that people of other counties would render them all necessary assistance to accomplish their object therefore they did not fear the strength of Caldwell County.” (Peck, “Manuscript,” 17–18; see also Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 666; also in HC 3:451.)

84. Merkley, Biography of Christopher Merkley, 4. In an October 7 letter signed by several vigilantes from Howard County, they indicated the Caldwell reinforcements numbered sixty-two. (See Document, 40.)

85. Adam C. Woods statement in Document, 40–41; see also HC 3:157.

86. Letter to the Citizens of Howard County, 7 October 1838, in Document, 40; see also HC 3:156.

87. Dunnica is the source stating there were six emissaries, but other than himself he does not identify them. (See William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838.) The names of the other representatives were obtained from other sources. (See “Report of the Committee of Chariton County,” 5 October 1838, in Document, 36; Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13; and Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 40.) Isaac Leany stated the Mormons sent a request to Chariton officials requesting they send representatives to investigate the disturbances. (Leany petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 480.)

88. Report of the Committee of Chariton County, 5 October 1838, in Document, 36.

89. William F. Dunnica letter, 7 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838; and Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

90. HC 3:158. See Root, Smith, Leany, and Murdock petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 332, 347, 480, and 504. Warren Foote wrote, “The militia, (who were Missourians), were called out, but they took sides with the mob.” (Foote, “Autobiography, 24.)

91. Edward Lampkin to Thomas Bradford, 14 October 1838, in “Expulsion of a Poor, Deluded and Miserable Set of Villains,” 135.

92. Stevenson, “Life and History,” 90; see also HC 3:158.

93. Joseph Smith, “Extract, From the Private Journal of Joseph Smith, Jr.” Times and Seasons 1 (November 1839): 3. See also HC 3:157; Joseph Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347; Taylor, A Short Account, 3–4; and Rigdon An Appeal to the American People, 39. One press report indicated a messenger bearing dispatches arrived in Jefferson City to meet with the governor around October 6. This may have been Mr. Caldwell. (See Missouri Republican, 11 October 1838.) John Corrill later stated the governor denied telling the Mormons they would have to fight it out, but expected the militia officers would settle the difficulties. (See Corrill, A Brief History, 35–36.)

94. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Rigdon indicated at this time Root and Thomas solicited the Saints to give up and leave. Furthermore, Thomas said he had received assurances from the vigilantes that if they left they would not be harmed and they would be reimbursed for all their losses. (Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 40.)

95. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13.

96. Leany petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 480–81.

97. Hinkle turned the sword over to Sashiel Woods. The sword was reported to have been in the possession of the Masonic Lodge in Carrollton. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 138, note #1; also “Rev. Sashiel Woods, Extremist!” in Ray County Mirror 6 [29 September 1979]: 9.)

98. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. Blackwell wrote that just before the meeting was to be held, a message was received from the Mormons indicating they had decided to retain possession of their Carroll County property. (Ibid, 14.) Before leaving the state Murdock delivered up the deed to the De Witt property, but he did not clearly indicate whether or not he was reimbursed for the property. (See Murdock, “Journal,” 22.)

99. Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 215; also HC 3:158. John Murdock recognized there was a numerical disparity against the Latter-day Saints, although his estimates were undoubtedly incorrect. He wrote, “after maintaining our ground and holding the place about 10 days, against a force 8–10 times our number, we were forced, contrary to the law of the land, or any just right, of either God or man, to surrender the place. (Murdock, “Journal,” 20.)

100. Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 667–668, also in HC 3:451–52; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 39. See also Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347; Jesse Papers of Joseph Smith 1:215; and HC 3:158.

101. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504; see also William Hawk petition in Ibid, 228; also HC 4:58. Both Sidney Rigdon and Joseph Smith stated there were members of the community who died under the adverse circumstances although there is no evidence in any other sources to substantiate this. (See references under previous footnote.)

102. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504.

103. Boggs to the House of Representatives of the State of Missouri, 5 December 1838, in Document, 14. LeSueur suggested several possible reasons why Boggs did not get involved: (1) he possibly experienced embarrassment after having called out several thousand militia during the September disturbances in Daviess, which troops proved not to be needed; (2) Atchison successfully resolved the Daviess problems without him; and (3) coming out against the actions of the vigilantes would be unpopular, thus harming him politically. (LeSueur, The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 108.)

104. HC 3:159; Rigdon, An Appeal to the American People, 40; Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504; Humphrey petition in Ibid, 470.

105. Blackwell, “Reminiscence,” 13. A few Mormons were detained or unprepared and not able to leave with the main group. Charles H. Hales wrote, “I did not leave DeWitt quite as soon as the rest of the brethren as I stayed behind to assist one of my Canadian brethren, who was not quite ready when the rest were. We, however, calculated to overtake them soon, but one of his horses gave out, and he was compelled to stay. I was then under the necessity of going to Far West on foot, and alone, since he, himself, gave up the idea of going.” (Hales, “Autobiography,” 34.)

106. Judd, “Autobiography,” 9.

107. Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347; also Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith 1:215.

108. William F. Dunnica letter, 12 October 1838, in Missouri Republican, 18 October 1838.

109. Judd, “Autobiography,” 9. Whereas Judd states the woman’s name was Downey, the Prophet’s history indicates her name was Jensen. (HC 3:159–60.) This is an obvious error. The surname is of Scandinavian origin and no individuals with that last name were known to have been church members during the Missouri period. (See Jensen surname entries in Black, Membership of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 1830–1848, 25:453–56.) Whereas Judd indicates the woman was older, other sources state the reason for her infirmity was due to a recent childbirth. (Avery petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 128; Rigdon petition in Ibid, 668; also in HC 3:452–53; and HC 3:159–60.) Although Joseph Smith’s history states there were several who died (see HC 3:160; Jessee, Papers of Joseph Smith, 215–16; and Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 347), the majority of sources indicate the woman was the lone fatality. (See Avery, Humphrey, Leany, and Murdock petitions in Ibid, 128, 471, 481, 504.)

110. Judd, “Autobiography,” 9–10.

111. Murdock petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 504. Under this date Warren Foote wrote, “[October] 14th. On our way home from meeting, we met several families from DeWitt, just getting in, amongst whom was S. Markham, and company, whom we left in Illinois. They were among those that were detained at DeWitt by the mob. During the skirmish there, Markham was shot at several times, but not hurt.” (Foote, “Autobiography,” 25.)