BYU Studies Logo

Chapter 9: The Massacre at Haun’s Mill

While the regional state militia was assembling in Richmond, the most lamentable and tragic episode of the Mormon-Missouri War took place at an isolated settlement in eastern Caldwell County at a site known as Haun’s Mill. Here, on the afternoon of October 30, 1838, seventeen Latter-day Saint civilians were killed and another fourteen wounded by an extralegal force, comprised of over two hundred revengeful men acting without official orders. The circumstances relating to the events, and the tragic loss of life inflicted by these county regulators upon a non-threatening and almost entirely defenseless community, serve to illustrate the extremes to which the public majority would go in order to bring about the removal of an unwanted religious minority from their society.1 [253]

The Mormon “cleansing” of Daviess County during the last half of October, coupled with the erroneous reports that Bogart’s forces had been routed and then annihilated at Crooked River on October 24–25, sent a signal to vigilante groups in northern Missouri that more extreme measures would have to be undertaken in order to restore local control and bring about complete Mormon submission. Anti-Mormon forces, principally from Livingston County, assisted by a number of Daviess refugees, as well as a handful of community regulators from other locales, were the first to respond to the Mormon strikes and did so in a retaliatory fashion. In writing about the Missourians who carried out the tragedy at Haun’s Mill, nineteenth century Missouri historian Return I. Holcombe wrote:

Nearly all of the men were citizens of Livingston County. Perhaps twenty were from Daviess, from whence they had been driven by the Mormons during the troubles in that county a few weeks previously. The Daviess County men were very bitter against the Mormons, and vowed the direst vengeance on the entire sect. It did not matter whether or not the Mormons at the mill had taken any part in the disturbance which had occurred [in Daviess]; it was enough that they were Mormons. The Livingston men became thoroughly imbued with the same spirit, and all were eager for the raid . . . feel[ing] an extraordinary sympathy for the outrages suffered by their neighbors.2

Furthermore, the historical sources demonstrate that the actions of the Livingston militia were not connected in any way to the governor’s order of Mormon extermination as some historians have concluded. Rather, their objective was to make the Mormons “pay” for their most recent activities in Daviess and at Crooked River—which payment would be in the price of human blood. [254]

 

The Haun’s Mill Settlement

Haun’s Mill was one of the first Latter-day Saint settlements founded in Caldwell County and took its name from the community’s founder, Jacob Haun. Following his conversion to Mormonism, Haun emigrated from his home in Green Bay, Wisconsin, to western Missouri. Two years later he moved to a remote site on Shoal Creek in the eastern part of what was still then Ray County, and contracted with Jacob Myers, Sr., to build a water-powered mill on the north side of the tributary.3 Haun was joined by other enterprising Mormon millers. In 1834, Robert White established a mill a short distance from Haun’s on the same creek.4 Still later, Jacob Myers, his son Jacob, Jr., and Ellis Eamut formed a partnership and built a rudimentary combination grist and saw mill adjacent to Haun’s site. Since there were three milling operations in the immediate area (two at the actual site of Haun’s Mill), Caldwell Mormons often referred to the general locality as simply “the mills.”5 Following the creation of Caldwell, Haun’s community was included as part of the new Mormon county and was situated approximately sixteen miles east of Far West in section 17 of Fairview Township and only four miles due west of the Livingston County border. [255] A branch of the Church was also subsequently established with David Evans called as president to preside over the members.6

Haun’s hamlet never included more than a few families and less than a dozen cabins. However, another seventy to seventy-five Latter-day Saint families lived in the immediate area, mostly in Fairview Township along Shoal Creek.7 These Saints and a number of local gentile settlers in the region came for several miles around to get their milling done by the enterprising mill owners. Furthermore, in addition to operating as an important agricultural production center for the eastern portion of the county, the outpost also served as a stopping place for Mormons coming from the east en route to Far West.

 

Prelude to the Attack

The Mormons living at the mill and along Shoal Creek were on relatively friendly terms with their non-Mormon neighbors until the problems erupted in Daviess County in mid-October. “All things continued to move on well; the inhabitants behaved themselves very friendly and purchased goods from [us] and used [our] mill[s] for grinding and sawing,” wrote Ellis Eamut. “This continued until the disturbances broke out up in Daviess county, when I observed from the conversation that they did not like the proceedings of our brethren.”8 Fearful they might expect treatment similar to that received by their neighbors to the north, gentile settlers living in eastern Caldwell sought help from Livingston’s vigilante forces, whose numbers were now strengthened with embittered Daviess refugees recently displaced from their homes. Two anti-Mormons, Sardis [256] Smith and George Miller, both of whom lived in the vicinity of Haun’s Mill in Fairview Township, were not only afraid of possible Mormon harassment, but feared they might also be mistaken as Latter-day Saints and thus mobbed by vigilante forces. To avoid any maltreatment altogether, Smith and Miller abandoned most of their property in the latter part of October, moved to Livingston County, and then hired a band of locals to go into Caldwell and bring back their belongings.9

The antagonism against the Haun’s Mill community was also fueled by Latter-day Saint dissidents who left the religious society and then spread false and misleading reports concerning Mormon intentions. One such individual may have been Robert White. As noted, White was one of the first members of the Church to settle in the area of Shoal Creek in 1834. However, by late October 1838, he became disillusioned with the sect, abandoned his mill, and moved to Livingston County.10 Following the Mormon War, Daniel Ashby, a Livingston citizen and a Haun’s Mill participant, testified before the House of Representatives for the state of Missouri that the reports given by Mormon dissenters who had moved into his county was the primary reason the decision was made to attack the mill. “They [the dissenters] reported that the Mormons intended attacking the people on our line, and that they intended burning a town,” he wrote. “The name [of the town] I did not catch.” Ashby went on to say that out of fear the Mormons would attack, “we thought it best to attack them first. . . . What we did was in our own defence [sic], and as we had the right [257] to do.”11 Significantly, several Mormon sources report White as being a member of the Livingston militia that attacked the mill.12

Livingston’s community regulators were quick to respond to the rumors. “The people liveing [sic] on Grand River about 6 or 8 miles north of the mill began to come over to Shoal Creek settlements where the Mormons lived and drove of[f] our cattle and made some thre[a]ts that they intended to come and burn down the mill[s],” wrote David Lewis.13 Since the mills were the economic and temporal lifeblood of the entire Mormon population in the region, the decision was made to post a continual guard to prevent any attempts to burn the structures.14

However, the threats soon escalated even further. Around October 25, a band of approximately twenty men headed up by Nehemiah Comstock of Livingston County rode into Haun’s Mill, demanding the Mormons turn over their guns and weapons. Fearing negative repercussions if the ruffians’ directives were not met, most of the men reluctantly complied. Hiram Abbot, however, refused, knowing the men had no authority to issue such orders. Fearing immediate retribution at the hands of the company members, Abbot ran, making his way across the mill dam and up the hill on the other side. Comstock and two other vigilante members, Elijah Trosper and Joshua Whitney, quickly dismounted and went in pursuit. While Abbot was in the act of climbing the hill on the opposite bank, Comstock took aim, making several attempts to shoot, [258] but the cartridge misfired each time. Seeing his attacker’s dilemma, Abbot turned his gun on Comstock who immediately sought cover behind a hen house. This gave Abbot the break he needed in order to make his escape and he darted away. Realizing a chase would prove useless, Comstock called Whitney and Trosper off, and the company left, satisfied that they were able to confiscate nearly all the weapons in the community. No sooner had the anti-Mormon band made their departure than messengers were immediately dispatched to send word to Mormon families living along Shoal Creek that hostile bands were active in the area and to be on guard.15

Anti-Mormon raiders also accosted Mormon companies traveling through the area en route to Far West. Abraham Palmer stated that while passing through Livingston County, his company was surrounded by a mob consisting of thirty-eight men who abused them and then took the only three rifles they had before allowing them to pass on.16 William H. Walker’s wagon company was stopped in the same area. Every wagon was searched and robbed of all its firearms and ammunitions. Then, as if the attack on the Haun’s Mill had already been planned, they were warned that if they proceeded on any further, they would all be killed. Two Mormon men were also taken prisoners.17 Captain William Mann and his group of Livingston guards were the likely culprits in these two detainments.18 Another Mormon company led by Joseph Young, brother of [259] Brigham Young, received even harsher treatment. Young’s party, comprised of some ten families, had almost reached Caldwell County when they were confronted by a Livingston band headed by Thomas R. Bryan (the county clerk), his brother Jefferson, William Ewell, and James Austin. “We were taken prisoners by an armed mob that . . . demanded every bit of ammunition and every weapon we had,” wrote Amanda Smith. “We surrendered all. They knew it, for they searched our wagons.”19 The raiders then took them back a distance of five miles to a location known as Whitney’s Mills, where they placed them under guard and detained them for three days. After finally being released, they proceeded on to Haun’s Mill where they arrived two days before the attack.20 [260]

After confiscating what weapons they could from both Mormon settlers and emigrants, vigilante leaders next sent messengers to the Mormon community, proposing that the two sides meet together to bring about terms of reconciliation. “The mob . . . sent word to us that they wished to meet a committee of our people and have an understanding of each other’s movements and expressed their wish to live in peace and friendly terms with us,” wrote Ellis Eamut.21 The Mormons were more than willing to oblige, recognizing they were at a distinct military disadvantage—having only a limited number of weapons, as well as being outnumbered due to the addition of the vigilantes from Livingston, Daviess, and other surrounding counties. Accordingly, David Evans, Jacob Myers, Sr., and Anthony Blackburn were selected to represent the Mormons in the discussions. Sources indicate that the mill’s leaders negotiated with leaders of several vigilante groups on different occasions. One meeting was held at the Myers settlement situated a few miles east of Haun’s Mill. Here the three Mormon delegates arbitrated with Samuel E. Todd, Zachariah Lee, Isaac McCroskie, Thomas R. Bryan, and William F. Ewell, all from Livingston County.22 About this same time, by means of a messenger, President Evans deliberated a truce with Nehemiah Comstock at which time both parties agreed to abandon their military organization.23 Finally, at least two meetings were held at the home of Oliver Walker with local citizens representing the non-Mormon settlers living among the Mormons in Fairview township in Caldwell County, and a third meeting was probably held with members of this same group on [261] the day of the attack.24 In each of these exchanges, both sides also agreed to leave the other alone and live peaceably.

Historical evidence, however, suggests that the attempts made by the vigilantes to confiscate the Mormon’s weapons, followed by the peace negotiations, were actually part of the overall plan of the Missouri regulators to ensure the eradication of the Mormon community. By disarming the Latter-day Saints, both those living in the area as well as those traveling through the region, the Mormons would be left virtually defenseless, making it possible for the attack on the community to take place with minimal resistance while at the same time reducing the risk of casualties. The pretended truce was conducted so that the Mormons would be led to believe they had nothing to fear and that an attack was not likely to occur.25 The Mormons, however, were neither totally naive nor unsuspecting of their enemies’ possible intentions. At the conclusion of these negotiations Ellis Eamut wrote, “We felt more satisfied, having, as we thought, a perfect understanding of their intentions, but at the same time we thought it best to keep up a watch at the mills for fear any individuals might come privately and burn them.”26 A few Mormon families living in the surrounding area moved to the mills and boarded with other Mormon families. “We [262] gathered to Ha[u]ns Mill for the Double purpose of our better Security,” David Fullmer remembered, “and Saving the mill from being burned.”27

Recognizing the volatility of the situation, the citizens of the mill community appointed Jacob Haun to travel to Far West to seek counsel concerning whether or not they should continue to maintain the mill site and remain in the area.28 While at Far West, Haun first approached John Killian, an officer in the Caldwell militia. Recognizing the isolated nature of the settlement and its proximity to the hostile Livingston and Carroll county forces, Killian counseled Haun to move the families into Far West at once.29 The mill owner also asked Joseph Smith for his counsel concerning the situation, whereupon he was told to abandon the mill so as to not risk the lives of the citizens. “But . . . Brother Joseph,” Haun replied, “we think we are strong enough to defend the mill and keep it in our own hands.” With that, he returned to the community and reported that Brother Joseph’s instructions were for them to stay and protect and hold the mill.30 David Lewis, a Haun’s Mill resident, believed Haun purposefully misrepresented the Prophet’s position and deliberately deceived the community members. He wrote that Haun “returned and said if we thought we could maintain the mill it was Joseph’s council for us to do so . . . and not to come to [263] Farewest and we thought from the way the thing was represented it would be like cowards to leave and not try to maintain it . . . [and] we thought to guether [sic] up all our affects and leave our houses would be useless, for we did not know that it was Joseph’s decided council for us to do so.”31 Later, the Prophet was reported to have said, “None had ever been killed who abode by my counsel. At Haun’s Mill the brethren went contrary to my counsel; if they had not, their lives would have been spared.”32 Ultimately however, the Haun’s Mill Saints themselves should not bear the blame for rejecting Joseph Smith’s counsel. Had Haun reported truthfully, presumably most of the community members would have followed the Prophet’s recommendation and moved into Far West. Thus, if responsibility is to be affixed to anyone, that individual must be Jacob Haun, and not the members of the community at large.33

Around noon on Sunday, October 28, Joseph Young’s emigrant company arrived at the Haun’s Mill “where we found a number of our friends, collected together who were holding a council; and deliberating on the best course for them to pursue,” Young wrote.34 By this time, Jacob Haun had returned from his meeting with Joseph Smith in Far West, and the community was [264] likely meeting in order to hear his report and discuss their situation. At the same time, community leaders were also aware William Mann and his men had been harassing Mormon emigrants. With the recent arrival of Young and his group, and learning from them that they had been detained for three days by Bryan and his Livingston men, it became even more clear that their antagonists had no intentions of keeping their agreements. The community was faced with only two options. They could abandon their homes and move into Far West, or they could remain and try to protect themselves and their property. Jacob Myers, Sr., favored leaving, reminding the group how few they were in comparison with the number on the side of the “Gentiles.”35 However, Haun’s “twisted” report tended to encourage them to remain, and “the decision of council,” wrote Joseph Young, “was that our friends there should place themselves in an attitude of self defence . . . [and be] in constant readiness for an attack of any small body of men that might come upon them.”36 Young’s company was also compelled to remain at the mills for another reason. For a number of days they had been short on rations. After arriving at the Mormon settlement they purchased what grain they needed and then concluded to remain until it could be ground.37 The families [265] camped in tents in the center of the community near the blacksmith shop owned by James Houston.38 With the addition of Young’s group (approximately ten families), the total number of Mormon families living at or near the mills came to about thirty. Thirty-five to forty adult men were on hand to defend the community.39

The Saints prepared a hasty defense. Although many of their firearms had already been seized as a result of the raids conducted by Comstock’s raiders, they set to work collecting what weapons could be found, including squirrel rifles and shotguns, while the women offered to mold bullets and prepare powder patches.40 Community leaders also made guard assignments and established night watches. Finally, the blacksmith shop was set up to be a garrison or block-house should an assault on the community take place.41

 

The Assault

On Monday, October 29, vigilante leaders met at the Woolsey property, situated about eight miles northeast of Haun’s Mill near present-day Breckinridge in Caldwell County. Here they made final plans to attack the Mormon settlement.42 By noon the next day, most of the men had assembled near what is today the community of Mooresville, in Livingston County, approximately ten miles east of the mill.43 The commander of the entire operation was Thomas Jennings, an old-[266]time militia officer.44 The regiment consisted of between two and three hundred men—the majority coming from Livingston—with Daviess, Caldwell, and Carrollton counties also being represented. (See Appendix I for the names of the men documented to have been part of the Livingston Militia).45 The men were divided into three companies, headed by Captains William O. Jennings (Thomas’ son, and Livingston County’s sheriff), Nehemiah Comstock, and William Gee.46 The entire regiment was on horses. Their approach to Haun’s Mill was in an open prairie along a line [267] between Mooresville and what is today Breckinridge in Caldwell County.47 About two miles from the mill community, they turned south. Here Colonel Jennings left James Trosper in command of a small number of men to guard a supply wagon and the two Mormon prisoners captured a few days previously.48

On the day of the attack, community life at the Mormon mill was going on in the usual fashion. For the most part, there was no sense of unusual foreboding or fear. In the early afternoon, David Evans, the Mormon captain, along with Jacob Myers, Sr., returned from a meeting with gentile leaders. This council could not have been held with the leaders of the Livingston force, since at the time they were in the process of traveling to the Mormon mill site. Therefore, it is probable that Evans and Myers had held the meeting with the local non-Mormon settlers living in close proximity to the community.49 Upon his return, Evans led those who could [268] be assembled in community prayer.50 Just prior to the attack, children were playing along the banks of the stream, the women were busily engaged in domestic chores and making the evening meal preparations, while most of the men were employed in their usual occupations—chopping and gathering wood, working in the nearby fields, or operating the mills. Hiram Abbot and Rial Ames were cutting each others’ hair.51

Sometime between three and four p.m. the vigilante force arrived in the area, stopping just north of the mill in the heavily timbered area running about a mile and a half in width and lying a few hundred yards north of the community.52 They were secluded by the undergrowth and were not detected until they began the actual assault. Upon emerging from the wooded area, the militia-mob advanced from three sides; Jennings aligned his men in the center, (i.e. the north), while Comstock and Gee’s companies took positions on the east and west.53 The Mormons at the mill who could see the approach of the Livingston militia at first thought they were some of their brethren from Far West. However, their blackened faces, red bandannas, and overall hostile appearance soon gave them away and a white flag was hoisted. Upon seeing the flag, the Missourians knew they were discovered and hastened the attack.54 The first line, comprised of [269] sixty to seventy men, came in full gallop towards the settlement, until they got within about one hundred yards of the mill, when they immediately halted and dismounted.55 Seeing the superiority of their numbers, David Evans, the Mormon captain, swung his hat, cried for peace, and called for quarters. His entreaty was not heeded. Comstock fired his gun, signaling his men to open fire. With the assault underway, Evans ordered the men to run to the blacksmith shop.56

The surprise attack threw the Mormons into an extreme state of confusion, especially the women and children who cried and screamed in excitement and terror. Thinking first of the safety of their spouses and children, a few men directed them across a plank running along the top of the mill dam to the south bank of Shoal Creek, then encouraged them to retreat further into the [270] woods.57 During the flight, the Missourians purposely fired on the innocent women and their youngsters. While running with one six-year old daughter at her side, and another year-old baby girl in her arms, Amanda B. Smith fled across the dam and up a wooded slope on the other side. “The bullets whistled by me like hailstones,” she later recalled, “and cut down the bushes on all sides of me.”58 Not knowing if the Missouri ruffians would pursue them, Margaret Foutz and several other women wandered a considerable distance before they believed they were out of danger. “We ran about three miles into the woods, and there huddled together,” she wrote, “spreading what few blankets or shawls we chanced to have on the ground for the children; here we remained until two o’clock the next morning.”59 Not all of the women found refuge in the woods. Olive Ames found a cubbyhole under a bluff alongside the stream large enough to conceal herself and several children.60 A number of other women fled to nearby cabins hoping they would not be pursued or discovered. Fortunately, nearly all of the fifty women and children living in the settlement made it to safety.

Only one woman, Mary Stedwell, was wounded in the initial assault. As the marauders made their first advance, she raised her hands pleading for peace. In doing so, she was shot in the hand. After being injured, she saw no other recourse than to run for cover with the other women and children. She did not get far. After reaching the opposite side of the creek and being [271] overcome by shock and fatigue, Mary fell down behind a log where she hoped to rest for a few moments while at the same time secluding herself from the militia. However, unknown to her, a portion of her clothing hung over the log, thus exposing her whereabouts to her attackers who were still in range and continued to shoot at her for some considerable time. Although she received no further wounds, her hiding place was examined after the attack and over twenty bullets were found lodged in the toppled trunk.61

While the women and children scattered into the woods and nearby homes, the majority of the men darted into the blacksmith shop where they had stockpiled what weapons they had.62 The shop was approximately eighteen feet square—not very large for the thirty-two men and three boys known to have entered the structure. The shop was built of large logs, spaced some distance apart. As they were neither chinked nor daubed, there were wide cracks between each log. On the north side, one log was cut out entirely to enable the Mormon defenders to shoot their guns from a position inside the building. There were also two windows. The door was located on the south facing Shoal Creek.63 While the Mormons believed the construction of the building would serve as an appropriate fortification, it soon proved to be more of “a slaughter-house rather than [272] a shelter.”64 “The shop was very open,” David Lewis wrote, and “each bullet that passed threw these many openings was bound to prove fatal to some of us within.”65

The Mormons held off their attackers for several minutes. However, because Colonel Jennings had organized his forces into at least two lines, after the first column positioned and fired, the second line took its place, thus allowing the first group time to reload. In this fashion, the militia was able to maintain a constant and continual conflagration upon the Mormons.66 It did not take long for the Mormons to perceive that they were not only outnumbered, but that they could not successfully defend themselves from their position inside the shop. Recognizing they could resist for only so long and that complete capitulation was inevitable, Evans, who by this time had made his way into the blacksmith shop, made a second attempt to call for a cease-fire. He ran out of the building, exposing himself to the enemy’s barrage, “[calling] for peace and solicit[ing] them to desist.” Nathan Knight also went out, joining Evans in supplicating for a truce, “but all to no effect.”67 During all this time, the Missourians continued their fire. In the process, Knight was [273] shot in the right hand, losing one finger and the use of another. Rather than go back into the shop, both Knight and Evans made an attempt to escape into the woods across the creek. While Knight was making his break across the mill dam he was shot in the leg. A third bullet hit him in the back with the ball passing through his body and lodging in the pit of his stomach. Although severely wounded, he continued his escape, making his way over the hill on the other side of the stream across from the mill and running about three-quarters of a mile into the woods where he remained until after the militia left.68 Evans escaped unharmed.69

The militia slowly closed in, forming a half circle on the north end of the shop and extending around the east and west sides.70 As they did so, their fire became more deadly. Several Missourians succeeded in taking sniper positions behind logs and trees within close range and were able to discern the movements of many of the Mormon men inside. About this time the Mormons inside the blacksmith shop experienced their first injuries and casualties. For example, David Lewis took a position by the west window, but in order to shoot out, he had to step on a block. On one occasion as he raised himself to the opening, he spied a Missourian who had his gun sighted directly on him, so he ducked back down, and dismounted from the block. No sooner had he [274] backed down than one of his comrades stepped up to the window to shoot and was immediately gunned down and killed.71

The vigilante force eventually succeeded in completely overwhelming the Mormons, thus enabling a few of their men to slip under the Mormons’ fire and secure positions directly outside the walls of the shop. Daniel Ashby, one of the Missourians who was ordered to move in and secure the building, observed that the man directly ahead of him made it safely all the way to the outside wall by squatting low to the ground. He then crawled over to one of the openings where the Mormons were shooting from and sat still. Within a short time, a Mormon defender put his gun through the gap, not knowing a militiaman was pitched directly beneath his muzzle, and then discharged his gun. No sooner had he drawn back his weapon, than the Missourian shoved his through the hole and fired.72 Within a short time “our men got possession of all the port house, cracks, &c.,” wrote Ashby, “and kept up such a constant fire that the Mormons could not get their guns out to shoot.”73

“Seeing no prospect before us but death, the mob manifesting all malice possible and would not listen to our cries and seemed determined to murder us all, we thought it advisable for us to make our escape,” wrote Ellis Eamut.74 The door, situated on the south side of the shop facing the creek, was the only feasible exit, and fortunately for the Mormons, it was on the only side not directly exposed to enemy fire. However, since the Missourians were also positioned on the east and west, anyone trying to make a break would still be mostly unprotected. It was clear [275] to the trapped men that anyone leaving would be shot at, but flight appeared to be their only hope for survival. Hiram Abbot, Tarlton Lewis, and two others were the first to make for the woods. Abbot was hit as soon as he left the door and received a fatal wound. Tarlton Lewis, who was right on his heels, was shot through the shoulder but not seriously wounded.75

When George Myers was about to break outside he observed a Missourian situated behind a tree leveling his gun at him, forcing him to drop back inside the shop. Recognizing that the sniper was waiting for him to make his move, Myers employed a small diversionary tactic. Using the rifle of one of his fallen associates, he put his hat on the end, and then raised the gun so the Missourian could clearly see it. Upon seeing the hat, the attacker moved from behind the tree and fired. This gave Myers a chance to aim and fire back. In doing so he wounded the man, but gave himself the opportunity he needed to make his break. After leaving the shop, Myers was hit a little below the right shoulder blade. He made his way across the dam and up the hill to safety. He walked as far as he could, but because of the loss of blood, he was soon forced to crawl. He crawled on his hands and knees the rest of the way to his house, which was located over a mile from the mill.76

While defending the shop, John Walker was hit with a ball in the right arm. Finding it impossible to reload, and knowing he would now be of little or no help, he and another Mormon defender made a dash for safety. The two men ran a short distance down the bank of the creek, bullets whizzing around them the entire time. As the two men were starting to ascend the hill on the opposite bank, Walker’s companion, who was just ahead of him, was shot down. Walker immediately sought some sort of protection and rushed under some lumber leaning against the [276] bank. “You are safest here,” a voice calmly said to him, and although the boards afforded little protection, he remained there until the militia left and received no other injuries.77

Sixty-two year old Thomas McBride was also wounded as he made his escape. However, in spite of his injuries he was able to make his way back to a deserted cabin where he secluded himself in the cellar. Here, he was subsequently found by eleven year-old Willard Smith. When the fighting broke out, Willard had made an attempt to go into the blacksmith shop along with his father Warren and two younger brothers Sardius and Alma, but was prevented from doing so. Seeking protection, the young boy crawled under a pile of timber where he was shielded temporarily, but was soon discovered by the militia, who immediately began shooting at him. “I crawled out and ran into an empty house on the slope near the pond. Here, I found . . . Father McBride, who had been wounded and had crawled into a potato cellar under the floor of the house,” he wrote. “He begged for a drink of water and to be helped out of the cellar,” Willard continued. In spite of the danger, the lad ran to the millpond where he was deliberately fired upon. “The bullets spatter[ed] in the water like hail,” however, he succeeded in getting the water and returned to the cabin “without a scratch.” Willard warned McBride he was sure to be discovered by the mob if he remained in the house, but the old gentleman chose to stay. Willard made him as comfortable as possible, then made his own way to safety.78 McBride was subsequently [277] discovered by Jacob Rogers of Daviess County. Rogers demanded the Mormon step outside and surrender himself and his gun. McBride did so, expecting to be taken prisoner, but instead Rogers shot him in the chest with his own weapon.79 This did not finish the old gentleman off however, whereupon Rogers, using a corn cutter, brutally slashed and mutilated McBride on his head, face, shoulders, and hands—nearly cutting off several fingers as well as an ear. He was then left lying in the creek.80

Jacob Foutz, Jr. came close to experiencing a fate similar to that of McBride. In making his run for safety he received a flesh wound to his thigh, while another ball hit him between his ankle and his knee, breaking his leg and causing him to fall. This gave several ruffians time to [278] catch up to him, one of whom was apparently Rogers, who had just finished off McBride and intended to do the same to young Foutz. However, just as he was about to kill Foutz, one of his confederates called out to Rogers, telling him if he killed the injured Mormon, he would shoot him. Then running up to the two men, the unknown man said that Foutz “was a damned fine man for he had ground many a grist for him.” With that, Rogers left Jacob alone. Strangely enough, two members of the Livingston militia later carried Foutz to his home where they “threw him on the bed, and hurried out the doors, as though they expected to be shot the next moment.”81

The last five to leave the shop were David Lewis, Isaac Leany, Jacob Potts, William Yokum, and Benjamin Lewis. David Lewis made his break alone. At first he thought he would surrender since sometime prior to the attack he had been sick. He was in a weakened condition and knew he would not be able to make a quick escape. However, after exiting, he found himself directly in the line of fire, so he immediately changed his mind, went down an embankment, crossed the stream, ascended a steep bank on the opposite side near Haun’s house, then headed south and went to his own home situated a quarter of a mile from the main community. During his retreat, due to his physical condition, he was unable to run. Although he was exposed to enemy fire for two hundred yards, and five shots went through his clothes, he was uninjured.82

Isaac Leany made a harrowing and miraculous escape. When he and his companions left the shop they were fired upon at a range of only four to five rods. Upon making his break, he was pelted with bullets and was hit several times. In spite of his injuries, he was able to make his way to the mill where he climbed down one of the mill’s timbers to the creek, then he waded through [279] the frosty water until he came to Jacob Haun’s home where several Mormon women had gathered. The ladies quickly ushered him into the cabin and attended briefly to his wounds. However, fearing the mob might storm the house and discover Leany, they removed a floor board, laid Leany down in the cavity, and re-secured the board. Here he remained until the vigilantes left, all the while suffering extreme discomfort as a result of his extensive wounds.83 Four balls had passed entirely through his body, leaving eight holes. He was also grazed by two more bullets, resulting in flesh wounds to each arm. During his flight his buck horn charger was shot away, as was the entire breech of his rifle. Following the ordeal, twenty-seven bullet holes were counted in his shirt and another seven in his pants.84

Jacob Potts, William Yokum, and Benjamin Lewis were each eventually hit by a barrage of enemy fire. After exiting the blacksmith shop, Potts was hit twice in his right leg. In spite of his injuries, he eventually made his way to David Lewis’ cabin where he borrowed a [280] horse and then rode to his home.85 William Yokum fell just after he had crossed the mill dam. He was hit in two places—once in his leg, probably causing his fall, and a second striking him in the face and passing through his entire head. He miraculously recovered from his head wound, but his leg was later amputated.86 Benjamin Lewis was mortally wounded shortly after making his break. He made his way to a fence where a man by the name of Rockholt, using a long-range rifle, shot him in the back, near the shoulder blade. Although severely injured, he continued on a short distance before his strength finally gave out. After the Missourians left the area, he was discovered three hundred yards from the shop.87

After the last group of Mormon defenders broke out of the shop, some of Jennings’ men yelled for quarters, and the Missourians finally ceased firing. Upon hearing the gunfire had stopped, a few of the Mormon defenders who had made their way to the bank opposite the shop shot a few final rounds before turning and running on.88 The Mormon men who escaped from the blacksmith shop did not fare well. Of the nineteen men who fled from the building, thirteen were wounded in their escape (three later died as a result of the their injuries), Thomas McBride was wounded and then killed, and John Walker, although wounded before he made his exit, succeeded in reaching safety. Only four Mormons, Rial Ames, Ellis Eamut, David Evans, and David Lewis, escaped uninjured.

With the fighting over, several members of the Livingston regulators cautiously approached the structure to investigate and determine the extent of the Mormon losses. Inside, [281] eight Mormons lay dead.89 In addition, four men were wounded, and another man and three boys were uninjured and had concealed themselves as best they could, hoping they would not be discovered. Once inside, the Missourians continued their hostilities, abusing the wounded who appeared to be close to death, and killing others. Three of the most severely injured were Simon Cox, Austin Hammer, and Warren Smith. Cox, the first Mormon to be wounded in the attack, received several balls in his mid-section.90 Hammer was hit in seven places, two shots having broken both of his thighs.91 Warren Smith, who was the worst off of the three, was almost dead. Recognizing all three men would not likely live long due to the extent of their injuries, the vigilantes began stripping them of their clothing and boots. William Mann, of Mooresville Township in Livingston County, was particularly brutal with Warren Smith. While pulling off one of his boots, Mann dragged the injured man across the shop, whereupon, Smith exclaimed, “Oh, you hurt me!” He then took hold of the other boot, dragging him once again until it came off. The strain was too much for the injured Mormon and Smith soon expired.92 Cox and Hammer were taken outside into the yard so the raiders could have more room to remove their boots and [282] clothing. Here, the two men were left to die, although both lived for several hours afterwards.93 The dead were also stripped of their salvageable clothing and footwear.94

While the Missourians were conducting their search of the shop, the most senseless shootings took place. At the time of the attack, three young boys had followed their fathers into the shop— Sardius (age ten) and Alma Smith (age seven), two sons of Warren Smith; and Charles Merrick (age nine), son of Levi N. Merrick. During the siege, the boys shielded themselves from the heavy gunfire by hiding beneath the furnace bellows. However, following the fight, one of the Livingston soldiers outside the shop could see where they were sequestered and, putting his gun through a large crack, fired a shot, wounding Alma in the hip.95 Upon further investigation from inside the building, the Missourians found all three boys. The Merrick boy tried to escape, making a break through the open door. As he ran outside, he was fired upon, receiving a load of buckshot and at least one ball, resulting in three wounds. He never recovered from his injuries and died four weeks later.96 A cowering and trembling Sardius pled for his life. However, a heartless and inhumane ruffian put the muzzle of his gun to the boy’s ear, discharging his weapon at point blank [283] range, literally blowing a portion of his head off.97 The third boy, Alma, though wounded, feigned he was dead, laying perfectly still until the men were gone.98

When the Missourians stormed the building, two Mormon men were still alive and initially eluded detection. Jacob Foutz, himself wounded in the thigh, could not make his escape with the others, so when the ruffians came in the shop, he laid face down on the ground pretending to be dead. His pockets were robbed and one man put his arm under him, hoping he had a pistol he could steal. He also overheard Sardius Smith’s pleadings, followed by the guns cracking which took his life.99 William Champlin was not only alive, but was in fact completely unharmed. Earlier, when the decision was made to abandon the blacksmith shop, he chose to remain inside rather than face what was sure to be a barrage of bullets. To protect himself from detection, he drew several of the dead bodies on top of him to make it appear as if he was one of those killed.100 Eventually, however, Champlin was discovered but he was not harmed. A Livingston militiaman later [284] reported that following the fight they “found one man in the house [i.e. the blacksmith shop] not hurt, who had fallen down in the early part of the action, and was covered with the slain.” Champlin was taken prisoner and held for three days before being released.101

The entire assault on the mill lasted between thirty and sixty minutes.102 Joseph Young estimated that the Missourians shot some sixteen hundred rounds at the Mormon defenders during the attack.103 The amount of Mormon firepower would have been considerably less, as evidenced by the fact that only three Missourians were injured in the encounter. John Hart, a Livingston resident, was wounded in the arm. John Renfrow had his thumb shot off. Allen England, a citizen of Daviess, was the most injured, being severely wounded in the thigh.104

 

Aftermath

Following the attack, with the exception of a few women and children, most of whom were hiding in the woods or an isolated cabin, the community was nearly completely deserted. The militia-mob spent about an hour plundering most of the abandoned Mormon homes, taking furniture, bedding, household articles, clothing, tools, guns, farm animals, wagons, horses, and any money they could find.105 Olive Ames observed the mobs’ activities from her hiding place. [285] “I could see them go into the houses and tents, carrying out clothing and bedding.” When they came to her house she saw them take some of her family’s belongings, putting all that they could on her husband’s horse. She believed what they wanted most was money. “What little money [I] had was hid away in my old clock,” she wrote. “I supposed that too would be taken, with all my bedding.”106 The amount taken by the Livingston men was considerable. A disabled Nathan Knight observed after returning to the settlement later that evening that Jennings’ men had taken nearly everything. “All of our property of every description [was gone],” he wrote, “both belonging to our camp and the settlement. . . . Brother Haun’s house escaped their ravages, but his horses were taken from the stable. I had nothing left but a small trunk; the contents were gone except a bottle of consecrated oil, which they had left on the ground.”107 After gathering the bounty, the Livingston marauders saddled up. As they were mounting to leave, Jacob Foutz recalled that one of their leaders yelled out, “hurraw boys lets git out of this plase.”108 That evening they rode back to the Woolsey property where they made their encampment for the night.109

The Mormons had no way of knowing what the intentions of Jennings and his men might be and expected they would possibly return and kill or capture the remaining Mormon men who had escaped. Believing the lives of Mormon settlers living along Shoal Creek, as well as those in other isolated areas of eastern Caldwell County were also in jeopardy, messengers were immediately sent from house to house spreading the news concerning the massacre and warning [286] the Latter-day Saints to be on the alert.110 Word of the massacre reached Church leaders in Far West later the next day (October 31).111

Despite the dangers of returning to the mill, many of the women and children who had fled during the attack returned, hoping to learn the fate or fortune of their husbands and fathers and loved ones. Amanda Barnes Smith was one of the first on the scene. She knew her husband had gone into the blacksmith shop along with the other Mormon men, but she did not know the whereabouts of her three young sons. As she approached the shop her greatest fears were confirmed. She was met by her oldest son Willard who had already been into the shop and was carrying the wounded Alma on his back. “They have killed my little Alma,” she screamed. “No,” replied Willard, “but Father and Sardi[u]s are dead.” He then begged her not to enter the shop, but to immediately attend to Alma.112 The wounded boy was taken by his brother back to the tent which had served as a temporary shelter for the emigrant family. “Our tent had been looted, even the ticking cut and straw strewn about,” Willard remembered, “[but] Mother leveled the straw and covered it with some clothing and on this awful bed we placed Alma, cutting off his pants to determine the extent of his injury.”113 Amanda discovered that her son’s entire hip—flesh, bone, and socket joint—had been completely shot away, and throughout the evening and into the morning hours, she performed a crude but effective operation using what articles were available to her. [287] After washing the wound using a pungent lye solution, she made a thick poultice from the roots of a slippery elm tree, then filled the contusion with the dressing and covered the entire wound with a linen bandage. The next day, Amanda and her four children were invited to move into the home of another LDS family. Here, for the next five weeks, Alma recuperated while lying flat on his stomach. The boy subsequently experienced a full and miraculous recovery.114

Because of darkness, the dead could not be buried and were left unattended. Many of the injured were brought to Jacob Haun’s home to be cared for.115 Nathan Knight, himself wounded in the hand, leg, and back, remembered the misery and suffering experienced by the wounded. “Their groans and shrieks made the night hideous and horrible beyond description,” he wrote. “The women were the only ones to administer comfort during that night of desolation and suffering.”116 In reality, there was not much that could be done, other than to make the injured comfortable. Many prayers were said and some of the men were administered to. By late evening, Isaac Leany was nearly lifeless and not expected to live, having received eight critical wounds. With little hope he would ever recuperate, “the elders [prayed] for his recovery, according to the order of the Holy Priesthood,” wrote John D. Lee. In spite of his condition, he was promised through prayer and faith in God a speedy convalescence. Significantly, Leany bore testimony that upon being [288] blessed, he had no pain whatsoever and within four weeks was completely healed.117 Others of the wounded were not as fortunate. Benjamin Lewis was discovered by some of the women several hundred yards from the mill. Unable to move him, they secured the help of Ben’s brother David. He was yet alive and in his proper senses, David recalled, but he was “gra[s]peing & groaning in his blood.” He rigged a slide up to a horse and moved him to his house, where he expired a few hours later.118 Later that same evening Austin Hammer also died.119 Simon Cox and John York died the next day (October 31), bringing the death toll to fifteen.120 Sixteen others were known to be wounded, two of whom—Hiram Abbot and nine year-old Charles Merrick—both died a few weeks later. The remaining fourteen eventually recovered although two men—William Yokum and Jacob Myers, Jr.—each had a leg amputated and were both life-long cripples. (See Appendix J for a list of the Mormons killed and wounded in the attack).

On the morning of October 31, the community members undertook the gruesome responsibility of seeing to the dead. However, the task of fashioning coffins or digging graves for each of the slain appeared nearly impossible under the circumstances. October’s temperatures had been unseasonably cold, resulting in the ground being nearly completely frozen.121 Furthermore, with so many of their numbers either dead or wounded and with only a few able-bodied men even [289] left in the community able to work, it appeared the task might take several days to complete. But the Mormons felt they did not have much time. “Every moment we expected to be fired upon by the fiends who we supposed were lying in ambush waiting the first opportunity to dispatch the remaining few who had escaped the slaughter of the preceding day,” wrote Amanda Smith.122 Believing Jennings and his mob-militia were subject to return at any moment, the decision was made to inter the bodies in the most expedient way possible.

Near the mill, an unfinished dry well, measuring some twelve feet deep, had been dug.123 It was in this hole that fourteen of the fifteen who died either during the attack or shortly after were buried. Joseph Young directed the operation, assisted by a few of the women, along with several men, many of whom lived in the vicinity but were not in the attack. Most of the dead were put on a plank, one at a time, then carried to the well, where the bodies were slid into the community grave.124 For nine year-old Artemisia Myers, the display was horrifying. “Every time they brought one, and slid him in I screamed and cried, it was such an awful sight to see them piled in the bottom in all shapes.”125 David Lewis recalled that this was “the most heart rending seen [sic] that my eyes ever witnessed.”126 [290]

The body of ten year-old Sardius Smith was the last corpse to be put in the common sepulchre. Joseph Young was one of the men who carried the boy’s body to the well, but he could not find it within himself to put the youngster in with the others, so he laid him on the ground beside the open grave. During their trek from Ohio to Missouri, the Smith family had been members of the emigrant company headed by Young, and while on their overland journey, he had taken an interest in the boy and the two developed a close friendship. Thus, when it came time to dispose of the body, the tender-hearted man could not perform the last rite. Upon learning her son remained unburied, Amanda Smith cried, “Oh, they have left my Sardius unburied in the sun,” then ran and covered her little boy’s remains with a sheet. There he remained until the next day until Amanda, along with her oldest son Willard, returned to dispose of the body. “I threw him into this rude vault [along] with the others,” she wrote, “and then covered [the grave] as well as we could with straw and earth.”127

On November 1, shortly after the community grave had finally been covered, James McBride, twenty-one year-old son of the slain Thomas McBride, came to Haun’s Mill. The McBrides lived some distance from the community, and on the day of the siege, James was to have been on guard. However, at the time, he was ill, so his father volunteered to take his place, and it was while he was on duty that the attack occurred. When word of the massacre reached the McBride home, James fled into the woods, believing the marauders would likely extend their hostilities against any remaining Mormon men living in the immediate area. He remained in seclusion for nearly two days, then decided to go to the mill to investigate the scene. He left a poignant recollection of his experience: [291]

About the first day of November, being tired of lying out in the woods, I concluded to venture a trip to the mill. I was anxious to see the grounds on which the slaughter took place; and learn if possible, the general situation of affairs.

Accordingly, with feelings that I can not here describe, I slowly wended my way to the spot.

I walked over the grounds, noticing here and there the blood stained earth—and seriously reflecting on our then sorrowful situation.

On the outside, the logs of the shop were defaced with bullet marks, and on the inside of the shop, the ground was scarcely visible for blood.

I traced the blood from the dead bodies of those who were carried and buried in the well. I went to the place and stood at the edge of the silent tomb of my beloved father. A silent prayer I offered to God, and turned away.128

The precise location of the well-site and grave of the fourteen Mormons is no longer known.129 [292]

Benjamin Lewis, the only other casualty who died immediately following the massacre, was not buried along with the others. He was buried the day after the massacre by his brother David who said he “dug a hole in the ground rapt him in a sheet and with out a coffin burayed him.”130 The burial took place on David’s property situated on the south side of the stream. [293] Sometime later, Lewis’ remains were exhumed and moved to a local cemetery.131 Hiram Abbot and nine year-old Charles Merrick, both of whom died several weeks later as a result of their injuries, were also buried separately. The whereabouts of their graves is not known.

After seeing to the dead, and fearing the possible return of the Livingston guard, many of the remaining men living in and around the community went back into temporary seclusion.132 Later in the day of October 31, a large contingent commanded by Nehemiah Comstock did in fact return. One Mormon remembered the triumphant marauders entered the Mormon village and “fyered there guns & blowed there bugle & frightened the neighbourhood, but did not kill anymore.”133 Comstock informed the residents that he and his men had come to bury the dead; however, upon finding the duty had already been attended to, they “expressed considerable satisfaction at having been relieved of the job.”134 Apparently on this same date, word of Boggs’ exterminating order had reached the camp of the Livingston militia, so the captain also notified the remaining Mormons of the edict, threatening them that they must either leave the state forthwith or they too would be killed.135 Throughout the day, Comstock’s men canvassed eastern Caldwell County, informing other Mormon settlers and emigrant companies of the governor’s mandate. [294]

Twelve year-old Lucy Walker remembered when her party was visited by one of Comstock’s men. At the time, the company her family belonged to was camped a few miles from the mill. On the day of the massacre, her father had gone to the settlement just prior to the assault and was wounded in the attack. While waiting to hear word of his condition, she said a fine-looking young Missouri officer rode into camp. Lucy was surprised by his behavior. Surprisingly, he did not threaten the group, but told them he came as a friend in order to save them from experiencing a fate similar to those at the mill. “He referred to the dreadful scene with words of sympathy and regret,” she wrote, and told them “he was forced to join the military to save his own life, but had done and would do all in his power to save the oppressed.” The young man led the group to a friendlier neighborhood where they not only met up with her wounded father, but also found temporary shelter from the inclement conditions.136

Life at the mill during the remaining months the Mormons occupied the site never returned to normal. Following the Mormon surrender, a contingent of Livingston militia occupied the site for nearly three weeks during which time the innocent Mormon families were often treated as if they were a conquered enemy. Even after the militia disbanded, the more vile Missourians continued their harassment until the last Mormon left the premises. But there were even greater hardships, and virtually every person suffered. Women who lost their husbands, as well as those wives whose husbands were wounded, suffered the most, since they not only had to care for their households, but provide for them as well. With many of their personal and household possessions taken from them and provisions and food being scarce, life during the winter of 1838–39 became essentially that of day-to-day survival. Most of the families banded together until they could make [295] arrangements to move along with the rest of the Saints to the more welcome hospices of Illinois. By the end of February 1839, all of the Mormons had gone.

 

The Attack Not Connected to the Exterminating Order

Most Mormon historians have concluded that the attack made by the Livingston militia on the Haun’s Mill community was associated with the October 27 extermination order of Governor Boggs—that Jennings, upon learning of the injunction, believed it gave him authorization for such an assault.137 Such a conclusion is simply based on the premise that since the exterminating order was issued on October 27, and the attack at the mill occurred on October 30, the massacre was apparently connected to the governor’s injunction. However, an examination of the sources indicates that there was no connection with the governor’s directive whatsoever. Rather, the attack by the county regulators upon the LDS community was actually a response or a retaliatory strike directed against the Mormons because of the raids they conducted against local vigilante leaders [296] and settlers living in Daviess County during the latter half of October, in addition to what was reported to have been the almost complete annihilation of Bogart’s Ray militia in the Crooked River engagement. Two major factors support this conclusion.

First, as noted, the attempts by Livingston and Daviess vigilantes to disarm Mormon settlers living in eastern Caldwell County and Mormon emigrant companies passing through the region, as well as the supposed peace agreements made with LDS community leaders, were part of the overall operation to annihilate the entire community, and were conducted even prior to Boggs issuing his October 27 directive. By confiscating the Mormons’ weapons, the vigilantes believed they could then carry out the attack with a minimal amount of armed resistance. Furthermore, by reaching a peace agreement with the LDS community, county regulators may have hoped the Mormons would then believe they had no fear of being attacked, thus catching them unaware and unprepared at the time of their assault.

Second, as noted, vigilante leaders made their final plans to attack the community on Monday, October 29. Although this was after Boggs issued his executive order on October 27, it would have been impossible for copies of the governor’s mandate to have been conveyed from Jefferson City to the two commanding major generals in the field (Atchison and Lucas), and then those same orders conveyed to sub-commanders such as Colonel Thomas Jennings in Livingston County in less than two days. Significantly, Lucas wrote that he and Atchison did not receive word of the extermination/removal order until sometime during the day of October 30, the very day of the massacre.138 Furthermore, it is highly unlikely that either of the two commanding generals, Atchison, who was somewhat sympathetic to the Mormons, or even Lucas, who was [297] bitterly anti-Mormon, would have used the exterminating order to authorize Jennings to move ahead and annihilate the Haun’s Mill community. Notably, even the Latter-day Saints at Far West did not learn of Boggs’ directive until October 31, the same day that Mormon survivors at Haun’s Mill reported Hiram Comstock’s return, at which time he then notified them of the extermination or evacuation policy. Thus, the Livingston militia probably learned of the order on the same day the Mormons did—October 31. Put simply, Jennings and his men acted on their own, without military authorization, and without a knowledge of the governor’s policy towards the Mormons as outlined in the October 27 directive. As one local history states, “Colonel Jennings made the attack on Haun’s Mill on his own responsibility, without orders from Governor Boggs, or other superior officer, although it is said that the Governor fully approved what was done afterward.”139 [298]


Notes

1. Narratives in the secondary literature dealing exclusively with the Haun’s Mill episode include: Alvin K. Benson, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre: Some Examples of Tragedy and Superior Faith,” Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint Church History: Missouri, 105–118; Alma R. Blair, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” BYU Studies 13 (Autumn 1972): 62–67; Blair, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” in Encyclopedia of Mormonism, 2:577; and Andrew Jenson, “Haun’s Mill Massacre,” The Historical Record 7 (December 1888): 671–684. Each of these articles are severely limited in their scope and depth of analysis, and contain only general facts related to the event. Gentry devotes a chapter to the massacre in his dissertation, “A History of the Latter-day Saints in Northern Missouri From 1836 to 1839,” 288–311; and LeSueur covers the event in a few pages in The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 162–68. However, I found these examinations to be less than complete. Local and regional Missouri histories containing shorter narratives of the tragedy include: History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 145–159; A History of Northwest Missouri, 377–79; History of Clinton and Caldwell Counties, 238–243; Caldwell County, Missouri History (n.p.: Caldwell County Historical Society, 1985), 6; An Illustrated Historical Atlas of Caldwell County, 3; and Carrie Polk Johnston and W. H. S. McGlumphy, History of Clinton and Caldwell Counties, Missouri (Topeka and Indianapolis: Historical Publishing Co., 1923), 238–43. With this chapter I intend to provide a more complete narrative and analysis of the Haun’s Mill episode.

2. Return I. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre: An Incident of the ‘Mormon War’ in Missouri,” in St. Louis Globe-Democrat, 6 October 1887, n.p.; also published in HRC 2:227. (Hereafter this source will be cited). Holcombe, who wrote this narrative under the pen name of Burr Joyce, was a late nineteenth and early twentieth century historian who wrote several county and local histories of communities and locales in Kansas, Missouri, and Minnesota. Walter B. Stevens, a noted Missouri state historian, later stated that Holcombe was the most noted researcher and writer of the Mormon experience in Missouri. (See Walter B. Stevens, Centennial History of Missouri: One hundred Years in the Union, 1820–1921, 6 vols. [St. Louis: S.J. Clarke Publishing Company, 1921], 115–16.) Gentry incorrectly identified him as “Reburn” Holcombe. (See Gentry, “A History of the Latter-day Saints in Northern Missouri,” 290, note #9.)

3. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 100; Caldwell County, Missouri History, 6; Williams, History of Northwest Missouri, 377; and Artemisia Sidney Myers Foote, “Artemisia Sidney Myers Foote’s Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” typescript, Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 1.

4. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 100, 476.

5. Ellis Eamut, “Reminiscence,” in Journal History, 30 October 1838, 11. The Myers and Eamut built their mills in 1837. This is confirmed in Amanda B. Smith, “Statement,” in Emmeline B. Wells, “Amanda Smith,” Woman’s Exponent 9 (1 April 1881): 165; and Smith petition in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 538; also HC 3:324.

6. James McBride, “Autobiography of James McBride,” typescript, Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 10.

7. Local history gives the names of some forty Mormons known to have made land entries in Fairview Township between 1835–37. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 476–78.)

8. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 11.

9. Ibid, 11. Isaac Leany, a Mormon who was wounded in the attack on the mill wrote that Smith and Miller were members of the Livingston militia that conducted the siege. (Leany petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 487.)

10. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 11. Eamut mentions White’s removal to Livingston in connection with that of George Miller and Sardis Smith. White’s apostasy is briefly referred to in David Lewis, “Autobiography,” manuscript, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City, Utah, 26; and McBride, “Autobiography,” 16. Another Mormon living in nearby Breckinridge Township by the name of John Pye also abandoned Mormonism about this same time and moved away—also probably into Livingston. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 636.)

11. Daniel Ashby, “Statement,” in Missouri Republican, 24 December 1838, 2.

12. See Smith, “Statement,” 189; and Smith petition in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 539; also in HC 3:325. See also Thomas D. Casper and Jacob Foutz petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 158, 208; also in HC 4:64, 68.

13. David Lewis, “Autobiography,” manuscript, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City, Utah, 10. Ellis Eamut wrote that both he and Gilmon Merrill (Eamut identified him as Gilman Merrick) lost some stock to the banditti, while Isaac Calkin and a Mormon by the name of Miller had their horses taken. (Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 11.)

14. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 12.

15. Ibid, 12–13; also Lewis “Autobiography,” 11; and Isaac Leany petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 266–67, 486. Jacob Foutz wrote that besides taking their guns and threatening to burn the mill, they also took some of their horses and cattle. (See Foutz petition in Ibid, 694.)

16. Abraham Palmer to W. Taylor and S. A. Taylor, 26 June 1839, manuscript, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1.

17. William H. Walker, The Life Incidents and Travels of Elder William Holmes Walker and His Association with Joseph Smith the Mormon Prophet (N.p.: Elizabeth Jane Walker Piepgrass, 1943), 6. Walker mentions that one of the prisoners was a man by the name of Clyde. (Ibid, 7.)

18. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 146; and Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 227.

19. Amanda Barnes Smith, “Reminiscence,” in Edward W. Tullidge, Women of Mormondom (New York: n.p., 1877), 121; see also Smith, “Statement,” 165; Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 538; also in HC 3:323–24; and Merrick petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 505. (Johnson gives the spelling as Myrick, whereas most sources give it as Merrick). Joseph and Jane A. Young give a similar description of their treatment in their petition in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 721; also HC 3:183. (Note: The account which appears in Young’s name in the HC differs slightly from the manuscript petition in Mormon Redress Petitions). The Young petition is the source most frequently cited in the secondary sources in describing the events associated with the massacre. American Historians Richard Hofstadter and Michael Wallace include Young’s account in a section on religious violence in, American Violence: A Documentary History (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1970), 301–04.

20. Young petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 721; also HC 3:183. Nathan K. Knight wrote that they actually escaped from their captors after they became drunk and fell asleep. (See Knight, “Extracts From a Statement of Nathan K. Knight,” in History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 157; see also Knight petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 260.) The site known as Whitney’s Mill was owned by Joshua Whitney who operated a mill and a ferry on Shoal Creek further downstream from Haun’s Mill. It was from Whitney’s mill that William Mann’s company harassed Mormon settlers. Whitney was also a participant in the incident associated with Hiram Abott cited previously. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 146, 701, 705, 1188.) According to local history, Whitney’s mill was situated in Livingston County. (See Ibid, 146, 705.) On the inside cover of Mormon Redress Petitions, historian Clark V. Johnson incorrectly placed the site of Whitney’s mill in Caldwell County. However, in a more recent short essay Johnson corrected this mistake. (See the map accompanying Johnson’s essay “Northern Missouri,” in Historical Atlas of Mormonism, 43.)

21. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 12.

22. Ibid, 12–13.

23. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 226. Holcombe stated the agreement with Comstock was reached on October 28. Margaret Foutz, a young girl at the time of the massacre, wrote that Evans met personally with Comstock. (See Margaret Foutz, “Narrative of the Haun’s Mill Massacre,” in Tullidge, The Women of Mormondom, 170.)

24. See Leany petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 267, 486. It was probably on one of these two meetings with the Caldwell non-Mormons that David Lewis was referring to when he wrote, “A short time previous to the massacre at Shoal creek, we made peace with the mob characters living near us . . . . We met them and an agreement was entered into between us, that we would live in peace, let others do as they would.” (Lewis, “Narrative of the Haun’s Mill Massacre,” in Times and Seasons 1 [August 1840]: 147.)

25. This conclusion is based upon the fact that many of the men who participated in the attack at Haun’s Mill were also members of the vigilante bands who confiscated the Mormon’s weapons, or also took part in the peace settlements. (i.e. Comstock, Mann, Bryan, Ewell, and McCroskie.)

26. Ibid, 13. Concerning these negotiations David Lewis wrote, “we then sent delegates to them to see if we could not compermise with them and live in pease, they met our delegates with guns and in a hostile manner, but fineally agreed with our men that they would be at pease with us.” (Lewis, “Autobiography,” 10.)

27. Fullmer petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 451; also Foote, “Autobiography,” 26.

28. Holcombe indicated Haun’s meeting with Joseph Smith took place on October 25. (See Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 226.)

29. Daniel Tyler, “Recollections of the Prophet Joseph Smith,” Juvenile Instructor 27 (1 February 1892): 94–95. Very little is known concerning the officer named John Killian as mentioned by Tyler. Parley P. Pratt stated that when Hinkle was not in Far West, Killian was the officer in charge of the Mormon forces. (Pratt, History of the Late Persecution, 33; also in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 78.) Sidney Rigdon also makes brief mention of Killian in connection with the Far West forces. (Rigdon petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 672–73.) Tyler, Pratt, and Rigdon all indicate Killian held the rank of captain.

30. Tyler, “Recollections,” 95.

31. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 11–12; see also Dibble, “Narrative,” 90. Holcombe wrote that after Haun told Joseph Smith that the Saints would be willing to defend the community, that the Mormon leader told them they could remain. (See Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 226.) In light of the statements made by Mormons more familiar with the circumstances, Holcombe’s commentary appears to be incorrect.

32. HC 5:137. John D. Lee expressed a similar view. He wrote, “The massacre at Haughn’s [sic] Mill was the result of the brethren’s refusal to obey the wishes of the Prophet. All the brethren so considered it. It made a deep and lasting impression on my mind, for I had heard the Prophet give the counsel to the brethren to come into the town. They had refused, and the result was a lesson to all that there was no safety except in obeying the Prophet.” (Lee, Mormonism Unveiled, 81.)

33. Because Haun failed to disclose the Prophet’s actual counsel, some Saints held him partially responsible for the tragedy. This fact may have been a reason why Haun apparently left the Church following the Missouri period. His name disappears entirely from the historical records and his whereabouts after 1838 is not known.

34. Young petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 721; also HC 3:183.

35. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 226.

36. Young petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 721; also HC 3:183.

37. Knight, “Statement,” 157. Ellis Eamut wrote, “About this time a number of movers from the East came up, intending to settle in that section of the country. . . . They stopped a few days at the mills and purchased some provisions until they should find a place to settle. (Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Those known to have been members of Young’s company included the families of Nathan Knight, Warren Smith, and Levi Merrick.

38. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 13; and Smith, “Reminiscence,” 121. Warren and Artemisia Foote are the sources stating Houston owned the blacksmith shop. (See Artemisia Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 1; and Foote, “Autobiography,” 26.) Houston was apparently absent from the community at the time of the attack.

39. Jacob Foutz and Mahlon Johnson stated there were thirty-six, Isaac Leany, thirty-seven. (See their respective petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 694, 472, 486.)

40. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 228; also History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 146.

41. Lee, Mormonism Unveiled, 78; Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 228; and History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 147.

42. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 227. The property likely belonged to Stephen, Thomas, or Zephaniah Woolsey, early property owners in Fairview and Breckinridge Townships in eastern Caldwell County. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 93, 636, 962–963.)

43. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 147.

44. In the History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, William O. Jennings is referred to as being the overall commander. (See 146–47.) However, this was an error and was corrected in the closing pages of the book. The correction reads: “In the account of the massacre at Haun’s Mill, and in other pages of this volume, it is stated that the so-called Gentile forces, or State troops, were commanded by Col. Wm. O. Jennings of Livingston county. So many statements were made to the compiler to this effect that the fact was not questioned. Too late to insert the correction in the proper place, comes the assertion of two or three parties, who ought to and doubtless do know the truth of the matter, that it was Col. Thomas Jennings, the father of Wm. O. Jennings, who was the chief in command. Wm. O. Jennings was the captain of the leading company and bore a most conspicuous part, and being a prominent citizen and well known, it came to be believed, after a lapse of so many years, that he was the commander. This correction is made mainly upon the authority of Robt. Lauderdale, who was at Haun’s Mill.” (See Ibid, 1263–64; see also History of Northwest Missouri, 560.) In 1861, Thomas Jennings shot and killed two men in Chillicothe, Missouri. One was deliberate, the other accidental. He was committed to jail, escaped, recaptured, and tried in 1862, but was not convicted. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 767–71.)

45. Of the two hundred or more men who comprised the company, over fifty have been identified.

46. Holcombe listed William Jennings, Nehemiah Comstock, and William Gee as the three captains. (See Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 227–28.) The History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, also names the same three men as being the captains in the operation (see 1015), but also names Comstock, Bryan, and Mann as having been captains in other companies that operated a few days prior to the attack. (See 146.) Bryan and Mann likely had their own commands prior to the attack of the Mormon settlement, but were not selected as captains in the Haun’s Mill operation. In compiling the History of Northwest Missouri, Walter Williams failed to recognize this point and names Comstock, Bryan, and Mann as the three sub-commanders with William Jennings and Gee playing prominent roles. (See 560–61.) As noted, Thomas Jennings was clearly the overall commander. Mormon sources clearly indicate William Jennings, Nehemiah Comstock, and William Gee played the most prominent roles in the attack, indicating they clearly held command.

47. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 147. Holcombe stated the men assembled at the Woolsey property near Breckinridge. (See Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 227.)

48. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 228; and History of Caldwell and Livingston County, 147. The two Mormon prisoners, one of whom was named Clyde, had been members of one the Mormon emigrant companies passing through Livingston County and had been captured a few days prior to the attack. While the attack at the mill was taking place, Clyde was able to make his escape. Nothing is known concerning the other Mormon prisoner. (See Walker, The Life Incidents and Travels of Elder William Holmes Walker, 6–7.)

49. Knight, “Statement,” in History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 157. Margaret Foutz wrote that just prior to the attack Evans returned from a meeting with Comstock. (Foutz, “Narrative,” 170–71.) However, as noted in the text, the meeting could not have been with Livingston officials such as Comstock, therefore Evans had to have been meeting with men representing the citizens in the immediate area. On at least two previous occasions, Evans had met with local non-Mormon settlers residing along Shoal Creek at the home of Oliver Walker. (See Leany petitions in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 267, 486; and Lewis, “Narrative,” 147.) John Hammer stated that a major meeting between the Mormons and the mob leaders was to have taken place on the evening of the day of the massacre. Hammer wrote: “Some of our leading men interviewed the mob leaders who agreed upon a certain day when they would send a committee to the mill to confer with our brethren and see if terms could be agreed upon whereby a compromise could be arranged. On the day thus fixed, being the 30th of October, a number of our brethren were at the mill hoping to have something of a reasonable talk, being of course, anxious that peace and security might be restored. With this understanding entered into, no violence from the mob party on that day was anticipated.” (John Hammer, “Reminiscence,” in Littlefield, Reminiscences of Latter-day Saints, 67.)

50. Smith, “Reminiscence,” 121.

51. Olive Ames, “Reminiscence,” in HRC 2:234; David C. Deming petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 440; Young petition in Ibid, 722; also HC 3:184.

52. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 146–47; Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 226.

53. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 1015.

54. Ames, “Reminiscence,” 235; Lewis, “Autobiography,” 12; and Hammer, “Reminiscence,” 67. Isaac Leany and Margaret Foutz are the sources that indicate the men had blackened faces. (See Leany petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 487; and Foutz “Narrative,” 171.) Eleven year-old Willard G. Smith remembered the militia as having both blackened and painted faces. (See Willard G. Smith “Reminiscence,” in Jeanine Fry Ricketts, comp. and ed., By Their Fruits: A History and Genealogy of the Fry Family of Wiltshire, England, and Their Descendants, Including the Allied Lines of Harwood, Ramsden, Toomer, Thurston, Bosen and Maddox [Salt Lake City: n.p., n.d.], 181.)

55. See Lewis, “Autobiography,” 12; and Foutz, “Narrative,” 171. Maviah Benner said after coming into sight, a war hoop was heard. (See Benner petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 417. Note: Johnson gives the spelling as Bennor, whereas most other sources give it as Benner.)

56. Young petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 722; also HC 3:184; and Lewis, “Autobiography,” 12. Lewis indicated after Evans called for quarters he neglected giving any official orders. (Ibid.) However, George Myers specifically remembered that since all of the guns were in the blacksmith shop, orders were given to run to the shop. (George Myers statement in Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 1.) By the time the Missourians opened fire, some of the Mormons apparently had already made their way to the shop. “Thinking their movements hostile,” wrote Ellis Eamut, “we immediately ran into the blacksmith shop for safety.” (Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 13.) Isaac Leany wrote that the Missourians first line fired between fifty and a hundred rounds. (Leany petition in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 487.) In November 1838, Daniel Ashby, a member of the Livingston militia, wrote up a report of the attack addressed to General John B. Clark. In the report Ashby stated the Mormons fired first. However, he noted that this was told to him by those men in the line ahead of him. (See Daniel Ashby to John B. Clark, 28 November 1838, in Document, 82.) Ashby was incorrect on this account since virtually all other sources indicate the Missourians initiated the fighting.

57. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 228. Amanda B. Smith stated that when it became apparent there would be trouble, “Our brethren shouted for the women and children to run for the woods, while they (the men) ran into an old blacksmith shop.” (Smith, “Statement,” 172; see also Willard Smith, “Reminiscence,” 181.) Ellis Eamut wrote, “The women . . . took to flight, taking their little ones along with them and running away from the scene of murder.” (Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 14.)

58. Smith, “Statement,” 173; and Smith petition in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 538; also in HC 3:324.

59. Foutz, “Narrative,” 171.

60. Ames, “Reminiscence,” 235.

61. Lewis, “Narrative,” 148. Lewis also recorded that following the ordeal, fourteen bullets were removed from the log “and preserved for future generations [as a] witness.” (Ibid.) See also Smith, “Statement,” 173; Smith, “Reminiscence, 126; and Smith petition in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 538; also in HC 3:324.

62. Foote, “Autobiography,” 26; and George Myers statement in Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri”, 1. Not all of the men ran into the shop. Joseph Young and David Deming indicated in their writings that they did not go inside and remained some distance from the action. (See Young petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 722; also in HC 3:184–85; and Deming petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 440–41.) Other Mormons who apparently did not enter the blacksmith shop include James Dayley, Mahlon Johnson, William Leany, Moses Kelley, and Levi Stiltz. (See Appendix J for information concerning these men and their connections in the engagement).

63. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 12; Lewis petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 274; and Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 228.

64. Lee, Mormonism Unveiled, 80.

65. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 12–13.

66. Ashby to John B. Clark in Document, 82. Ashby was in the second line.

67. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 13. While he and Evans were imploring for a cease-fire, Knight distinctly remembered hearing someone from the ranks of the Livingston militia command the men to “kill all, spare none, and give no quarters,” indicating that the attack was meant to be a whole-scale annihilation of the entire community rather than an attempt to bring the Mormons into subjection. (See Knight petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 477.) In writing six years following the massacre, Missourian James H. Hunt claimed the Mormons never called for quarters. He wrote, “It has been said by the Mormons that this was a wanton and cruel butchery—that no quarter was shown them when they called for it . . . this we are prepared to pronounce false; the Mormons did not call for quarter, or it would have been given them.” (Hunt, Mormonism, 188–89.) However, at least a dozen Mormon eyewitness later wrote that they called for quarters at least twice, and possibly three times. (See Abner Blackburn, “Narrative,” in Will Bagley, Frontiersman: Abner Blackburn’s Narrative [Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1992], 17; Lewis, “Autobiography,” 12; Smith, “Statement,” 173; and the following petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, Foutz, 694; Kelley, 474; Knight, 260; Leany, 267, 486–87; D. Lewis, 274; T. Lewis, 490; Potts, 320; and Smith, 538; also in HC 3:324.)

68. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 13; Knight, “Statement,” 158; and Knight petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 477.

69. David C. Deming, who was cutting wood on the opposite side of Shoal Creek at the time of the attack, watched Evans make his escape. He made his way across the dam and through the woods. While Evans was running, Deming asked what was going on, whereupon the Mormon captain stated that the Mormon men were either all being killed. (Deming petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 440.) Holcombe reported that after escaping, Evans did not stop until he arrived at Mud Creek, a distance of seven miles. He also stated that during the entire ordeal, Evans never discharged his weapon. (Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 229.)

70. Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 1.

71. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 14.

72. Daniel Ashby to John B. Clark, 28 November 1838, in Document, 82–83.

73. Ibid, 83.

74. Eamut, “Reminiscence,” 14. David Lewis stated Hiram Abott was the person who suggested they try to escape. (See Lewis, “Autobiography,” 14.)

75. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 14.

76. Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 1; Foote, “Autobiography,” 27; and Foutz, “Narrative,” 172.

77. Jane Walker Smith, “Jane Walker Smith’s Story,” in Kate B. Carter, ed., Our Pioneer Heritage 19 (1976): 205; and Lucy Walker Kimball, “Reminiscence,” in Littlefield, Reminiscences of Latter-day Saints, 38–39.

78. Willard G. Smith, “Reminiscence,” 181. After leaving McBride, Willard ran to another house close by where he found six frightened little girls huddled together on the bed. Significantly, he was instrumental in getting these children to safety. Concerning this incident he wrote, “As the bullets had followed me into this house, I said to the little girls: ‘Come we must get out of here or we will all be killed.’ So we ran to the millrace which we crossed on a board reaching the woods on the other side of the pond—-with the mob shooting at us all the way. After our race for life, the little girls scurried off like prairie chickens into the brush and tall corn.” After helping the girls to safety, Willard took shelter behind a large tree where he watched the activities of the mob-militia until they left. (Ibid.)

79. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 149; and Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 229–30.

80. McBride, “Autobiography,” 13. Rebecca Judd was reported to have been an eyewitness to the killing. (See Young petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 722–23; also in HC 3:185.) David Lewis indicated that Thomas McBride received more extensive injuries than those mentioned by his son James McBride. Lewis stated Rogers cut off several fingers, then cut off his hands, followed by his arms, and finally slashed open his skull. (Lewis, “Narrative,” 148–49.) However, James did not arrive on the scene until after his father had been interred. Lewis, on the other hand, was present during the massacre. Shepherd P. Hutchings stated that shortly after the massacre occurred, he was taken prisoner by a group of Missourians, and Rogers was among the group. He said he heard Rogers say the following: “I . . . took a corn cutter out of the hands of one of my comrades and swore that I would bring the d—d old cuss down. I ran to him and while he (McBride) cried for mercy, I fetched him a blow which took away a part of the top of his scalp; he still cried for mercy, but I didn’t care for the d—d cuss, and so I fetched him another blow over his temple, which fetched him down. I then tried to pull off his boots, as I wanted a good pair from some of the d—d Mormons.” (Shepherd B. Hutchings, “Statement,” 7 May 1855, Journal History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, 30 October 1838, 6.) It should be noted that in several sources Thomas McBride was reported to have been a soldier in the American Revolution. (For example, see Smith, “Statement,” 181, 189; Smith, “Reminiscence,” 122; Willard G. Smith, “Reminiscence,” 181; Lewis, “Narrative,” 148; History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 149; Foutz, “Narrative,” 172; Lee, Mormonism Unveiled, 80; Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 229–30; and two petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 117, 417.) This however, is an error. The confusion apparently lies in the fact that he was born in 1776, the year the Revolution began, making him sixty-two years old at the time of his death. (McBride, “Autobiography,” 5, 11.)

81. Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 2; also Kirk, Mormons & Missouri, 43–44.

82. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 15–16. In his redress petition, Lewis requested the state of Missouri pay him five thousand dollars, one thousand dollars for each hole in his clothing. (See Lewis petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 699.)

83. McBride, “Autobiography,” 13–14.

84. Isaac Leany petitions in Mormon Redress Petitions, 267, 487; and William Leany, “Autobiography,” 8. Leany described in detail the extent of his injuries. He wrote, “I am well aware that this is an incredible story to tell that a man being shot four times through [the] body made his escape by flight but I have the scars to show ten in number one ball entering my body through the inside corner of my left shoulder blade came out just about two and a half or three inches below my collar bone and as far as three inches on the right of the midle of my breast another entered through the muscle under the hind part of my left arm and passed through my body and came out under the middle of my right arm another passed through my left hip on the inside or through the uper end of my hip bone another through my right hip hit the bone just about the joint glanced out through the skin and rolled down my drawers leg in to my boot these four balls made eight visible wounds with two others one across each arm.” (Leany petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 487.) On 6 May 1839, at a conference of the Church held near Quincy, Illinois, Wilford Woodruff met for the first time several of the men who were at Haun’s Mill at the time of the attack. In his journal, Woodruff recorded meeting Isaac Leany who showed him his wounds. He wrote that Leany received all of his wounds “while he was running for his life & strange as it may appear all those wounds . . . did not lessen his speed in the least but he entirely out run his enemies & saved his life. We can ownly acknowledge it to be by the power & mercy of God.” (Wilford Woodruff, “Journal,” in Wilford Woodruff’s Journal: Vol 1, 29 December 1833 to 31 December 1840, ed. Scott G. Kenney. Midvale, Utah: Signature Books, 1983, 331.)

85. Ibid, 16; and Potts petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 319–20.

86. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 16; and Hyrum Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 627; also in HC 3:412.

87. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 16.

88. Daniel Ashby to John B. Clark, 28 November 1838, in Document, 83.

89. The eight men killed in the initial attack on the shop were: John Byers, Elias Benner, Alexander Campbell, Josiah Fuller, John Lee, Levi N. Merrick, William Napier (Naper) and George S. Richards.

90. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 13; and Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 2.

91. Hammer, “Reminiscence,” 67–68.

92. Smith, “Reminiscence,” 127. Following the Mormon surrender, Mann came to Far West where he showed the boots on his own feet and boasted, “Here is a pair of boots that I pulled off before the d—d Mormon was done kicking.” (Ibid. See also Smith, “Statement, 173; and Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 538; also in HC 3:324.) Nathan Knight wrote that after Smith died, the men stripped him of his hat and coat then continued “dragging him around after he was dead and kicking him.” (Knight, “Statement,” 158.)

93. Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 2; and Hammer, “Reminiscence,” 67–68.

94. George W. Russell, a Latter-day Saint, remembered hearing a Missourian by the name of Nathan Gomer boast that he had pulled the boots off of one of the dead Mormons, then sat on the body while putting them on his own feet. (George W. Russell, “Statement Made to George A. Smith by George W. Russell son of Isaac Russell,” manuscript, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2–3.)

95. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 18; Smith, “Reminiscence,” 123.

96. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 229; Myrick (Merrick) petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 505; Smith, “Statement, 173. As young Merrick made his escape, those who shot at him may have initially thought he was one of the Mormon men trying to make his escape. (See Williams, History of Northwest Missouri, 560.)

97. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 18; and Lewis “Narrative,” 148. Four men are mentioned in connection with the brutal killing of Sardius Smith. Joseph Young and Amanda B. Smith reported Ira Glaze was the culprit. (See Young petition in Mormon Redress Petitions, 723; also in HC 3:185; and Smith, “Reminiscence,” 127). Local history attributes the killing to William Reynolds (see History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 149, and note #2; and Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 229.). David Lewis, a Haun’s Mill resident, stated Stephen Reynolds killed the boy. (See Lewis petition in Mormon Redress Petitions, 275–76; and Lewis, “Narrative,” 149). Nathan Knight claimed he heard Jesse Maupin claim responsibility. (See Knight petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 260; and HC 3:187.)

98. HC 3:186–87. In 1840, at the age of eight, with the assistance of his mother, Alma wrote a short petition about his ordeal during the massacre. He recorded, “I run [ran] into a blacksmith shop where my father was. I crept under the bellows as also did my brother and an other [sic] boy by the names of Charles Merrick I was wounded in the hip, my brother had his brains blown out, and the other boy received three wounds and has since died of them.” (Alma Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 537.)

99. Foutz petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 694; and Leany petition in Ibid, 487.

100. Leany petition in Mormon Redress Petitions, 487; Lewis petition in Ibid, 275; and Foutz, “Narrative,” 172–73.

101. Daniel Ashby to John B. Clark, 28 November 1838 in Document, 83; Kelley petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 474; and Kirk, Mormons & Missouri, 43.

102. Deming petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 440–41.

103. Young petition in Ibid, 724; also in HC 3:186.

104. History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 150, 716, 993; and Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 231–32. England was probably wounded by George Myers as discussed in the text.

105. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 230. Several Mormons made mention of the plundering activities of the militia immediately following the battle in their redress petitions. (See the following petitions in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions: Foutz, 694; Leany, 268, 487; Lewis, 275; Mahlon, 473; Myrick (Merrick), 505; Naper, 506; Potts, 320–21; and Young, 723–24; also in HC 3:186. See also Foutz, “Narrative,” 172; and Willard G. Smith, “Reminiscence,” 181.)

106. Ames, “Reminiscence,” 236.

107. Knight, “Statement,” 158.

108. Foutz petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 694. Willard Smith reported, “after taking all the horses belonging to their victims, they rode off howling like Indians.” (Willard Smith, “Reminiscence,” 181.)

109. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 230.

110. Kimball, “Reminiscence,” 39–40. Ellis or Rial Ames was one of the messengers who brought word of the tragedy and warned the Mormons in the region. Abner Blackburn recalled: “Mr Eames [Ames] escaped the massacre and came to our house about dark and said the Missourians were a going to kill all the Mormons on Shoal Creek that night. Every one grabbed their clothes and ran for safety to the woods. The mob satiated their thirst for blood [and] retired from their glut of gore.” (Blackburn, “Narrative,” 17.)

111. See Hyrum Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 627; also HC 3:412.

112. Willard Smith, “Reminiscence,” 182.

113. Ibid.

114. Smith, “Statement,” 181–82; Smith, “Reminiscence,” 122–24, 127–28; Willard G. Smith, “Reminiscence,” 182–83; and Alvira Lavona Smith Hendricks, “Reminiscence,” manuscript, Special Collections, Harold B. Lee Library, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, 1. (Note: Included with the Hendricks manuscript is a letter noting the correct authorship of the document). A bone-like gristle replaced the missing bone and socket, allowing Alma full use of his hip and leg. (See also Andrew Jenson, “Alma Lamoni Smith,” in The Historical Record 5 (December 1886): 118–19.)

115. Hammer, “Reminiscence,” 68. The wounded were also in other homes. Abner Blackburn, whose family lived a short distance from the mill, wrote that their home “was full of wounded and dessolate families.” (Blackburn, “Narrative,” 17.)

116. Knight, “Statement,” 158.

117. Lee, Mormonism Unveiled, 80–81.

118. Lewis petition in Johnson Mormon Redress Petitions, 276; and Lewis “Autobiography,” 16. While her husband was dying, Benjamin’s wife loaned a horse to a young man so he could go to Far West to get help. However, en route, the young Mormon met a band of nine men, headed up by Sashiel Woods, who forced him to travel to Richmond where they held him captive for several days, took the horse, and robbed him of several personal items. (Ibid.)

119. Hammer, “Reminiscence,” 68.

120. Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day Saints in Missouri,” 2; and Lewis, “Autobiography,” 17.

121. Blackburn, “Narrative,” 17.

122. Smith, “Reminiscence,” 125–26.

123. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 17. Warren Footed wrote that the well was on the property owned by Jacob Myers, Jr. (See Foote, “Autobiography,” 27.) However, LaMar C. Berrett, a former BYU professor of Church History and an authority on the Missouri period of LDS history, has done extensive research concerning Mormon property holdings at the site and is convinced the well was on the mill property and was owned by Jacob Haun, not Myers.

124. See Lewis, “Autobiography,” 17; Fullmer petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 452; Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 232.

125. Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day [sic] Saints in Missouri,” 2.

126. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 17.

127. Smith, “Statement,” 182; and Smith, “Reminiscence,” 126.

128. McBride, “Autobiography,” 14–15.

129. After the Mormons abandoned Haun’s Mill, a man by the name of Charles R. Ross moved onto the property. Ross came to Missouri from Tennessee, arriving only nine days after the massacre. At first, he settled in Utica in Livingston County, but moved to the mill in February 1839, where he leased the property from Jacob Gudgill (the new owner), and occupied the home to which the well belonged and where the bodies were buried (probably Jacob Myer, Jr.’s residence). It was reported that soon after he moved onto the property several “warm days came” and an offensive smell came from the mostly filled-in well and so he made a mound over it. In time, the mound settled, making it level. In 1845, Ross tore down the mill and the blacksmith shop. In 1887, Ross, and a son of Josiah Fuller, one of the Mormons killed in the attack, located the well site and marked it by placing one of the millstones—edgeways into the ground. (See History of Caldwell and Livingston Counties, 100, 148 note #1, 151; 501–502; Richard Neitzel Holzapfel, T. Jeffery Cottle, and Ted D. Stoddard, eds., Church History in Black and White: George Edward Anderson’s Photographic Mission to Latter-day Saint Historical Sites, 1907 Diary and 1907–08 Photographs [Provo: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1995], 101, 103; and Holcombe,” The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 232.) One year later, in September 1888, Assistant LDS Church historian Andrew Jenson, Joseph F. Black, and Edward Stevenson went to the site. Both Jenson and Black noted that the they were able to find the burial spot by means of the millstone placed there the previous year by Ross and Fuller. On this occasion, Andrew Jenson recorded in his journal, “After offering up our prayers by the red tombstone (millstone) which had been placed over the well, we walked about seven miles in a northeast direction to Breckinridge.” (Andrew Jenson, “Personal Diary of Andrew Jenson,” E-Book, LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City, Utah, 117; see also Jenson, Autobiography of Andrew Jenson, 160; and Black, “The Journal of Joseph Smith Black, in Carter, Our Pioneer Heritage 10:290–91.) In 1941, Glen M. Setzer, a local resident in the area, removed the red millstone from the well site and placed it along side a cement marker that he made and which he situated adjacent to the Haun’s Mill site. The words on the marker read: “Southwest of here on October 30th 1838 occurred the incident generally known as the Haun’s Mill Massacre. This site located by Wm. R. Pemberton. This marker placed here by Glen M. Setzer, 1941.” Unfortunately, Setzer likely had no knowledge that the red millstone had been place over the well by Ross and Fuller in 1887 to mark the grave of the Mormon victims. In November 1995, using a number of historical sources, a research team consisting of LaMar C. Berrett, Alexander L. Baugh, Charles W. Allen, John Eldredge, and Randy Olsen identified the approximate location of the original well, 282 feet west and slightly north of where the mill dam was located.

In May 1996, Robert Parker, director of the LDS Visitors Center in Independence, had Don Berchtold, a full-time missionary serving in the Missouri Independence Mission, construct a large wooden sign with the following inscription: “Approximate site of Haun’s Mill Well—On October 30, 1838 seventeen men and boys were killed and buried in the well. A metal plaque with the names of the seventeen Mormons killed was also attached to the sign. Parker and Berchtold received permission to place the sign on the Haun’s Mill property by W. B. Spillman, president of the Restoration Trail Foundation for the RLDS Church. The information on the sign is not only incorrect (only fourteen Mormons were buried in the well), but it was also placed in the wrong location. In a conversation with Berchtold, he informed me that he located the well site by witching. The sign is several feet further north and west than the site located by Berrett’s research team.

Significantly, two other millstones from the mill site have been discovered. In 1907, the Mormon photographer George Edward Anderson visited the location. His party found one of the millstones partially buried in the ground on the north side of the stream, which they subsequently removed, and using a brush and white paint, inscribed the following on the stone: “In Memory of the Victims of Haun’s Mill Massacre Oct 30th 1838.” (Anderson Journal in Holzapfel, Church History in Black and White, 97.) This millstone is now located in the city park in Breckenridge, Missouri. Anderson also noted that a family name White, who had owned the property following the Mormon evacuation, had removed one of the millstones and was apparently using it for a step to a house. In recent years, Dawsey Karner, a local resident gave this stone to Charles W. Allen, who gave it to LaMar C. Berrett. Berrett donated it to the LDS Visitors Center in Independence, Missouri, where it is presently on display. In 1986, a piece of the mill wheel came into the possession of the Church. The metal wheel was purchased by Newell Kitchen from a man in Breckenridge who claimed he and another man found the piece of machinery while fishing at the mill site. (“Institute Class Discovers Artifact from Haun’s Mill,” Church News, 25 July 1987, 10.) The mill wheel is on display in the LDS Church History Museum in Salt Lake City. The caption describing the wheel states: “Face Wheel From Haun’s Mill—The small settlement of Haun’s Mill in Northern Missouri as the site of the bloodiest attack on the Latter-day Saints. On October 30, 1838, seventeen men and boys were killed by an armed militia. The face wheel functioned in a mill to transfer the force from the water wheel to the millstones to grind the grain. Gift of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, arranged by the LDS Institute of Religion at the University of Missouri (Columbia).”

130. Lewis, “Autobiography,” 16.

131. Anderson, “Journal,” in Holzapfel, Church History in Black and White, 61.

132. Foote, “Experience in the Persecutions of the Latter Day [sic] Saints in Missouri,” 2. David Lewis stated on this occasion he and Joseph Young “went and concealed ourselves in the brush near by, for fear they would come to my house to renew there slaughter.” (Lewis, “Autobiography,” 20.)

133. Lewis petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 275; also Lewis “Autobiography,” 19; and Lewis, “Narrative,” in T&S 1:149.

134. Holcombe, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 232.

135. Ibid; see also Smith petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 539; also in HC 3:324–25; and Smith, “Statement,” 189. Abraham Palmer stated that on the day after the massacre the mob came to him and several others and told them if they would deny their religion they could live in peace, but if they would not, they would have to leave the country or suffer death. (Palmer petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 512.)

136. Kimball, “Reminiscence,” 40; and Walker, Life Incidents and Travels of Elder William Holmes Walker, 7.

137. In his multi-volume history of the Latter-day Saint movement, B. H. Roberts wrote that the “butchery was doubtless the first fruits” of the order. (Roberts, Comprehensive History of the Church, 1:483.) Roberts further stated, “In history the Haun’s Mill massacre will stand as an incident in direct sequence of the issuance of Governor Boggs’ Order of Extermination.” (Ibid.) Leland H. Gentry, took a less definitive stance, but still believed there was a connection. Gentry concluded, “While it cannot be shown for certain that [Thomas] Jennings took his sanctions from Boggs’ Order, it must be admitted that certain facts argue strongly for it.” (Gentry, “A History of the Latter-day Saints in Northern Missouri,” 306.) Alma Blair, an RLDS historian, wrote that at the time the massacre occurred, news of the exterminating order was “widely known” and therefore a leading factor in the decision to move against the outlying Mormon settlement. (Blair, “The Haun’s Mill Massacre,” 63.) Donna Hill, who wrote what many considered to be the most accurate biography of Joseph Smith, also attributed the action to the edict. (Donna Hill, Joseph Smith: The First Mormon [Garden City: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977], 235–36.) In the first edition of their comprehensive work of the Mormon movement, Mormon historians James B. Allen and Glen M. Leonard state that the conflict was “part of an apparent effort to literally carry out the governor’s extermination order.” (James B. Allen and Glen M. Leonard, The Story of the Latter-day Saints, 1st ed., [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1976], 127.) In the second edition published in 1992, the authors omitted the sentence. However, the narrative still suggests that the massacre occurred as a result of Boggs’ order. (See 136–137.) Finally, Stephen C. LeSueur suggests the attack possibly occurred as a result of the mandate but he did not take a position on the issue. (See LeSueur, The 1838 Mormon War in Missouri, 163–64.)

138. Samuel Lucas to Lilburn W. Boggs, 2 November 1838, in Document, 72; also Lucas to Boggs, 5 November 1838, in Ibid, 71. Lucas and Atchison were camped on Log Creek, about seven miles south of Far West at the time the express was received.

139. History of Clinton and Caldwell Counties, 240. While detained as a prisoner following the Mormon surrender, Levi Richards asked a Missouri official if the men who massacred the Mormons at Haun’s Mill were called out under the governor’s orders or were they mobbers. He was told they were the latter. (See Richards petition in Johnson, Mormon Redress Petitions, 328.) In a newspaper article appearing less than two weeks following the massacre the reported stated, “We understand that the company engaged in the attack at Splawn’s [Haun’s] creek, was not attached to any division of the army, but was fighting on it own hook.” (Missouri Republican, 12 November 1838, 2).